Luke Cage vs. Loki

So it looks like everyone except H1 thinks Loki does this to Luke thorboned?

Originally posted by h1a8
It takes less than 2 tons of strength to replicate Loki's feat. Cage's feat shows strength above 50 tons (feat is beyond 10 tons and casual means he can apply 5x more force).

The above isn't a negative statement and thus the claim does require proof.

Luke beats Loki. It would be very hard for Loki to hurt Luke.

Originally posted by h1a8
Luke beats Loki. It would be very hard for Loki to hurt Luke.

If Loki is strong enough to hurt Thor, he's strong enough to hurt Luke.

Originally posted by h1a8
Luke beats Loki. It would be very hard for Loki to hurt Luke.

So you're dropping your retarded claim about it taking less than 2 tons to replicate Loki's feat?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you're dropping your retarded claim about it taking less than 2 tons to replicate Loki's feat?

That would require him to stop being a retard.

Originally posted by FrothByte
If Loki is strong enough to hurt Thor, he's strong enough to hurt Luke.

Not to mention Luke would have a tough time hurting Loki. Knock him around, sure (physically, Loki isn't the biggest guy around). But actually causing damage is a different story.

Originally posted by FrothByte
If Loki is strong enough to hurt Thor, he's strong enough to hurt Luke.

IMO, Luke > or = Thor in durability.
The gun bending feat puts his strength on par with Thor and past Loki.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Not to mention Luke would have a tough time hurting Loki. Knock him around, sure (physically, Loki isn't the biggest guy around). But actually causing damage is a different story.

h1a8: "I don’t even think Thor is rifle bulletproof."

H1a8: So does this mean you think Luke can beat Thor in an unarmed h2h match?

Originally posted by FrothByte
H1a8: So does this mean you think Luke can beat Thor in an unarmed h2h match?

I think Thor is the better fighter. Strength is close.
Luke Cage is a little more durable.

Thor wins after a tough fight.

Originally posted by h1a8
I think Thor is the better fighter. Strength is close.
Luke Cage is a little more durable.

Thor wins after a tough fight.

And do you think Luke can hurt Hulk with his punches like Thor did? Do you think Luke can survive a thrashing like the Hulk gave Loki without getting knocked out?

Luke has better piercing durability feats than Thor, because he gets shot at like 90% of the time, so it's to be expected. But Thor has way better blunt force durability feats. Luke's best blunt force durability showing to date is probably eating an impact from a speeding garbage truck without injury. Thor soaks up hits from the Hulk.

And lol at the two of them having comparable strength. I have a lot of love for MCU Luke, but just no.

Loki wins...

Originally posted by h1a8
I think Thor is the better fighter. strength is close.
Luke Cage is a little more durable.

Thor wins after a tough fight.

LOL!!!!!!!

Originally posted by h1a8
IMO, Luke > or = Thor in durability.
The gun bending feat puts his strength on par with Thor and past Loki.

I challenge you to a BZ in regards to Thor and Luke's strength and durability.

What feat by Thor greatly exceeds the gun bending feat?

Knocking Hulk through several meters of metal with a normal hammer, dazing him in Ragnarok.

Stopping one of Hulk's blows with one arm, then holding it with both in the Avengers.

Dismantling spaceships barehanded in Ragnarok.

Want more?

Originally posted by h1a8
What feat by Thor greatly exceeds the gun bending feat?

Crushing Iron-man's armor, hitting Iron-man so hard that he goes through a tree, catching and holding Hulk's arm, cracking a prison made for the Hulk, ripping spaceships apart etc etc etc.

For crying out loud, watch the movies before commenting on them.