Jordan Peterson vs. Cathy Newman

Started by jaden10115 pages

This interview was the perfect example of an interviewer not doing their research and trying to wing it on the basis of the controversy that surrounds Peterson.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
ITT: Bashar demonstrating why people are turning away from his political spectrum. He can't be bothered to make a single substantive point, and despite being outclassed intellectually thinks himself "above" debate or reason because he just assumes his side is the right one despite not knowing anything about the arguments against it.

Now I'm sure he's going to quote me and then say something about me being triggered. 🙄

nah, i feel no need to state the obvious

That you have no idea what you're talking about? I don't think you have the self-awareness to recognize that, no.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah, i feel no need to state the obvious

What specifically has Peterson said you disagree with?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
That you have no idea what you're talking about? I don't think you have the self-awareness to recognize that, no.

😆

Lol, missed that. Hilarious.

Earlier today I was reading some article from The Guardian about Peterson and they call him dangerous lol.

I have no idea who either of these people are.

Originally posted by jaden101
This interview was the perfect example of an interviewer not doing their research and trying to wing it on the basis of the controversy that surrounds Peterson.

Yeah, pretty much this.

Bash, could you make a serious counter. This is surt-tier nonsense from you.

>how dare you assign certain tendencies to women based on averages? every woman is different you old prune. also, women on average make 9% less money than men, so accept that they're all at a disadvantage in the workplace.

this debate in a nutshell

Speaking of the wage gap myth, a bunch of feminists are suing this company tescos... because warehouse workers who are mostly men make more money than attendants in stores or something who are mostly women...

They're literally pissed that people get paid differently for two different jobs and are trying to sue over it lol

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Bash, could you make a serious counter. This is surt-tier nonsense from you.

^^Love how I live inside this kids head.

I'm still waiting for anyone who disagrees with Jordan to actually post something he said they have a problem with. Or is this just standard SJW nonsense where you don't like him cuz he makes fools of leftist cucks?

It's the same reason, deep down, that some on the left hate Ben Shapiro. They can't out debate him, they know it, he knows it. So they call him a nazi.

Peterson makes Cathy, and others, look like damn fools. So of course now he's being portrayed by The Guardian as a dangerous man who isn't fully alt right, but who is flirting with it.

Remember the college where one of the people told a student that playing a clip of Peterson and being neutral is like neutrally showing a Hitler speech? Yeah, that's the level of idiocy we're dealing with.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Bash, could you make a serious counter. This is surt-tier nonsense from you.

i am under no obligation to counter anyone. i made an observation on page 1 that the clown was declaring himself an infallible authority based on a phd, who's every marginal hypothesis must be accepted. since when is it my responsibility to pay audience to everyone who got ass-blasted by my comment? also, think what you want of me bruh. i'm not here to impress you. *shrug*

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i am under no obligation to counter anyone. i made an observation on page 1 that the clown was declaring himself an infallible authority based on a phd, who's every marginal hypothesis must be accepted. since when is it my responsibility to pay audience to everyone who got ass-blasted by my comment? also, think what you want of me bruh. i'm not here to impress you. *shrug*

So you can't give us anything Peterson said you disagree with? Okie dokie.

let's also file that under "not my obligation".

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
let's also file that under "not my obligation".

I'm going to actually file it under "dude doesn't know what he's talking about and is trying to save face".

i voiced a valid criticism concerning his absolute claim of authority on the matter, which he clearly suggested. i am not allowed to say that without then being obligated to dissect his entire dissertation?

oh well, i guess i'll just have to face the consequences. what are they? 😮