Hollywood glorifies violence, but blames the NRA and Conservatives

Started by Silent Master10 pages

I forgot about that. you're right.

I would edit the post to fix a couple of small errors, but the board won't let me.

Originally posted by cdtm
Looks more like calling out Hollywood as the hypocrites they are.

You can't claim a title of progressive while profiting off the very things you criticise.. Ethics don't work that way.

#burn

Originally posted by Silent Master
The reason the vast majority don't want those countries getting nukes is because of the people in charge of those countries.

It's hilariuosly how hard you failed at crafting a gotcha scenario, in reality all you did was essentailly agree with my point.

Right! Exactly right! The solution is not to focus on Kim Jong Ill’s mental health or arm South Korea with Nukes also, the solution is to prevent the crazy mofo from getting a nuke in the first place.

Same way there’s civilians in the USA who are just as crazy as North Korea. Solution is to prevent them from getting weapons of mass destruction!

I think you agree with me here

Originally posted by Firefly218
Right! Exactly right! The solution is not to focus on Kim Jong Ill’s mental health or arm South Korea with Nukes also, the solution is to prevent the crazy mofo from getting a nuke in the first place.

Same way there’s civilians in the USA who are just as crazy as North Korea. Solution is to prevent them from getting weapons of mass destruction!

I think you agree with me here

Yea but you said you had him on ignore, so I guess you were lying?

In case you didnt know, he already has Nukes.

Nice attempt, but my stance from the very beginning has been we need to improve our mental health screenings in general and have better background checks.

So again, I'm glad you've finally seen the light and can now admit that I was right.

Originally posted by Blindside12
Yea but you said you had him on ignore, so I guess you were lying?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nice attempt, but my stance from the very beginning has been we need to improve our mental health screenings in general and have better background checks.

So again, I'm glad you've finally saw that light and can now admit that I was right.

I agree with you on both those things + assault weapons ban

Originally posted by Firefly218
Right! Exactly right! The solution is not to focus on Kim Jong Ill’s mental health or arm South Korea with Nukes also, the solution is to prevent the crazy mofo from getting a nuke in the first place.

Same way there’s civilians in the USA who are just as crazy as North Korea. Solution is to prevent them from getting weapons of mass destruction!

I think you agree with me here

But you are still talking to him, so one of two things just happened. You just now put him on ignore to try and prove me wrong, which you still talking to him means you are not actually ignoring him. Or two, you have him on ignore and just making it harder on yourself to still talk to him, which you are clearly doing.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I agree with you on both those things + assault weapons ban

What good would banning semi-auto rifles do?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nice attempt, but my stance from the very beginning has been we need to improve our mental health screenings in general and have better background checks.

So again, I'm glad you've finally seen the light and can now admit that I was right.

If only Mental Health wasn't a bullshit profession..

Ever been to one? A shrink or psyche? They all pretend they give a shite about what you're saying as they count up the billing hours..

Originally posted by Silent Master
What good would banning semi-auto rifles do?

You know whats funny.

The same people who say banning assault rifles will fix the problem, are the same ones saying the wall wont stop people or drugs from coming illegally. They want it both ways, because their idea is "better."

Originally posted by Silent Master
What good would banning semi-auto rifles do?
Not just semi-auto rifles but every gun that shoots rapidly, including handguns. Banning them makes it harder for crazies to shoot up the joint

Originally posted by Firefly218
Not just semi-auto rifles but every gun that shoots rapidly, including handguns. Banning them makes it harder for crazies to shoot up the joint

If walls dont stop people, then how will banning guns stop gun murder?

Originally posted by Firefly218
Not just semi-auto rifles but every gun that shoots rapidly, including handguns. Banning them makes it harder for crazies to shoot up the joint

Just like making alcohol illegal back in the day made it hard to get or how making drugs illegal makes them hard to get?

The only thing making 99% of guns illegal will do is create a massive black market for them, thus making them easier for criminals to get and ensuring that all of us law abiding people are easier targets.

Why do you want that?

Originally posted by Firefly218
Not just semi-auto rifles but every gun that shoots rapidly, including handguns. Banning them makes it harder for crazies to shoot up the joint

And getting rid of automobiles will stop drunk drivers what's your point?

Originally posted by Blindside12
You know whats funny.

The same people who say banning assault rifles will fix the problem, are the same ones saying the wall wont stop people or drugs from coming illegally. They want it both ways, because their idea is "better."

They're the same people who make fun of the military, because they know they wouldn't cut the mustard. If a grenade was thrown at them, they wouldn't smother it and save their comrades. They'd throw the guy next to them onto it, saving themselves.

Progressives go for the easiest solution, even if its no solution at all. Or they scream at the sky. I dare you to try and watch this past 10 seconds.

YouTube video

Progressives are all about image.

They're feminists who throw their girllfriend down the stairs because they refuse to get an abortion.

They're pro gun regulation, and they have a hitman on speed dial.

They're progressive icons, and their name is Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton

They're against punching down, unless they're the ones doing the punching.

Show me a progressive who's identity isn't based on opposition to conservative neo-nazi anti-feminist klansmen cisgender white former slave owner southerners, and I'll show you a progressive with some integrity.

I said earlier that I dont believe they actually want gun control right now, cause it wont help them on the ballot box this year. There is a bill in the Senate right now nobody is talking about on Gun Control, and they dont want you talking about it. It doesnt help them at all if Trump passes something.