Originally posted by Emperordmb
If someone like Warren or Gillibrand runs I will legit buy a maga hat.
Meaning you accept that America isn't great in 2020 even after four years of Trump? Lolz.
I'm hoping they both do, though I doubt either would win the nom in 2020, really depends on the climate. Either would make a good VP choice for the 2020 nom (eg like Biden) and then run again for POTUS in 2028 after having eight years as VP under their belt.
Something else that belongs in here:
The left: "How dare Trump mimic Ford! THE HORROR WHAT AN *******!!!"
Also the left: "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE KAVANAUGH SNL SKIT WAS SO FUNNY OMG"
Fits right along such things as:
the left: "HOW DARE SOMEONE INSULT THE APPEARANCE OF A FEMALE POLITICIAN! REDUCING THEM TO THEIR BODY LIKE THE SEXIST PIGS THEY ARE HOW DARE THEY!!!"
also the left: "HAHA TRUMP'S A ****ING CHEETO WITH SMALL HANDS AND A MUSHROOM PENIS"
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, sure, when you DARVO it and Kavanaugh becomes the victim.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, sure, when you DARVO it and Trump becomes the victim.
I enjoy Trump hair jokes as much as the next guy as well as Cory Booker having googly eyes, or Mitch McConnel having the mannerisms of a turtle, or Nigel Farage looking like he's on cocaine with that massive smile.
I think it's hypocritical though to cut out a certain portion of politicians for whom their appearance is off limits when it's some grand resistance when you do it with other politicians.
I think it's fine regardless. We live in the age of memes, an age where anyone will mock anyone's appearance if it contains comedic value. In the past it was probably different, a certain reverence of respect granted to male politicians that was not granted to female politicians. But it seems that age is gone and now we live in the age of irreverent memes where virtually noone in the public arena is treated with some puritanical reverent respect.
The past is not really the past though, not really really. Improvements here and there, absolutely sure.
eg Look at what Orrin Hatch said in regards to Blasey-Ford, that she was credible and "attractive" and "pleasing", because if she wasn't attractive, then somehow her accusation is less credible because everyone knows ugly women don't get sexually harassed or raped. That was his implication.
You're an overall smart guy, take the blinders off.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Something else that belongs in here:The left: "How dare Trump mimic Ford! THE HORROR WHAT AN *******!!!"
Also the left: "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE KAVANAUGH SNL SKIT WAS SO FUNNY OMG"
Fits right along such things as:
the left: "HOW DARE SOMEONE INSULT THE APPEARANCE OF A FEMALE POLITICIAN! REDUCING THEM TO THEIR BODY LIKE THE SEXIST PIGS THEY ARE HOW DARE THEY!!!"
also the left: "HAHA TRUMP'S A ****ING CHEETO WITH SMALL HANDS AND A MUSHROOM PENIS"
Also consider the hilarity of who played Kavanaugh. Matt Damon, who said he'd go scorched earth and even spend millions of dollars to protect his name lol. Who himself got in trouble for daring to say that perhaps there are different levels of #MeToo, and that harassment isn't rape and dude was told to "shut up".
Originally posted by Robtard
The past is not really the past though, not really really. Improvements here and there, absolutely sure.eg Look at what Orrin Hatch said in regards to Blasey-Ford, that she was credible and "attractive" and "pleasing", because if she wasn't attractive, then somehow her accusation is less credible because everyone knows ugly women don't get sexually harassed or raped. That was his implication.
You're an overall smart guy, take the blinders off.
It's obviously wrong here. Also take sexual "harassment" in the workplace, if a woman accuses some flirtatious guy of sexual harassment, but wouldn't have considered it as such if it was a more attractive guy she had actual interest in it would be totally fine and not transgressive. That would also be an issue.