The New Gods

Started by quanchi1125 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Zack M
😂
Movies here kids not comics. I’m the only one who gets it.

😂

Darth Thor Senior Member

Nope. Spider-Man movie rights owned by Sony. But hes still clearly a Marvel character.

Plus this coming from the guy who claimed Star Wars is now Marvel because the comics are done by Marvel.

So yeah always a pleasure to throw back your own idiocy back a ya.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Nope. Spider-Man movie rights owned by Sony. But hes still clearly a Marvel character.

Plus this coming from the guy who claimed Star Wars is now Marvel because the comics are done by Marvel.

So yeah always a pleasure to throw back your own idiocy back a ya.

Star Wars is owned by Disney both cinematically and the comics. It’s hilarious to see you spin the comics out of the movie forum. Star Wars sales comics wise are factored under the marvel brand. That’s what I referred to. I never included Snoke in the MCU just as Motu are not going into the dc worlds. Sony, kid.

😂

Zack M Senior Member

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Nope. Spider-Man movie rights owned by Sony. But hes still clearly a Marvel character.

Plus this coming from the guy who claimed Star Wars is now Marvel because the comics are done by Marvel.

So yeah always a pleasure to throw back your own idiocy back a ya.

He's a moron. That explains it.

Flyattractor Senior Member

Excepts for the Star Wars being done under the IDW Title. And the Marvel Characters that are being done under the IDW Title as well..

so...OOPS!!!

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard
Why not both though? I'd love a MotU live-action film if done right. Thundercats too.
I'd rather see battle of the planets over both of them, but yeah I'm down with MoTU and Thundercats too.

Flyattractor Senior Member

I'd rather see animated movies over Live Action. Animated tends to be able to avoid certain tropes and pitfalls that the Live Action Movies can't.

That and I don't see how you can do a Live Action T-Cats with out it looking like Cat's The Stage Musical The Movie.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Excepts for the Star Wars being done under the IDW Title. And the Marvel Characters that are being done under the IDW Title as well..

so...OOPS!!! [/B]

Diamond comics recognizes Star Wars under the marvel brand for sales figures. Facts side with me as per usual.

Flyattractor Senior Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
Diamond comics recognizes Star Wars under the marvel brand for sales figures. Facts side with me as per usual.

Only its the IDW Label that The People See. Not the Marvel One.

So Sad for you that Marvel can't make their own comics any more.

SO sad.


😆

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Only its the IDW Label that The People See. Not the Marvel One.

So Sad for you that Marvel can't make their own comics any more.

SO sad.


😆 [/B]

Disney owns marvel so sorry but they get factored into their comics sales. You’re so shaken all the time over the success of Disney. Lovin’ it.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]I'd rather see animated movies over Live Action. Animated tends to be able to avoid certain tropes and pitfalls that the Live Action Movies can't.

That and I don't see how you can do a Live Action T-Cats with out it looking like Cat's The Stage Musical The Movie. [/B]

I actually think CGI Thundercats could be O.K. Think an update on the wolves in the Underworld films with Cats heads instead of Wolves. They could be quite intimidating on screen at say 8ft tall.