Originally posted by dadudemonAs I said, I'm perfectly fine with these braiders having to have schooling and a license, especially if they're taking in income; it should also be taxed.
Here's what you and I missed on our first go-around:Paid vs. not Paid
If any of these "naturalist braiders" are taking money, it's illegal. It's unlicensed professional services being exchanged for money. Doing any sort of hair styling, for money, falls under the regulatory umbrella of Licensed Cosmetology practices. Any state that requires cosmetology licensing for hairstylists would be beholden to this regulation.
We may be upset about having to go to Cosmetology school to obtain a license to be in business but this is just how it is. Also under cosmetology:
1. Nail Technicians
2. Hair Stylists
3. Esthetician
4. Cosmetics (Beauticians)
5. BarberingIf you wish to style hair and be paid, in any form, you must obtain the license. It does not matter that you wish to only braid hair. If you want to be a professional, you must follow the regulatory laws that govern your discipline.
Obviously, the libertarian part of my political beliefs says that this regulation is absolutely stupid. The only way the government should interfere with this client-business relationship is to tax it.
"If two or more parties, under sound-mind, seek to undertake a private contract, whether complex or simple, whereupon all parties agree in the exchange of goods, services, or currency, the government shall not infringe upon said relationship. The greatest extent that the government - hereafter defined as all aspects of the Federal, State, and Municipal governments that are best fit to tax the heretofore mentioned "private contract" - is taxation that is assessed and levied at the current date of signature of the 'private contract.' All signatories, unless otherwise specified in the 'private contract', are responsible for taxation."
Addendums and clarifications to the above would include things such as "doesn't matter if one or more of the parties are not US Citizens, Permnanet bla bla bla".
Something like that.
My concern is the state requiring them to do the same hours of schooling for something so minor in comparison. Imo, the schooling system should be revamped, to more accurately reflect the proper amount of schooling ($$$ paid) for level of profession. As it is now, some people are being ripped off in their chosen profession.
eg A friend of my owns her own tiny beauty shop in San Francisco, she does facials (black head/zit removal) and body hair removal, anything from eyebrows to buttholes and everything in between. I think she did over 300hrs of schooling to be licensed for that. I see no reason why a glorified hair-braider needs the same amount of schooling hours, does seem like it's just a money-grab from the state of TN here.