Moral Question

Started by BackFire2 pages

I would eat the dog directly. No use wasting it.

Does the dog belong to someone?

Can the dead dog be eaten afterwards? That would make two meals.

A lot of fatasses in this thread.

Simple economic question.

It's like raising a zombie army, would it allow zombies work minimal wage works?

Originally posted by ILS
You might see a video of dog slaughterhouses on your FB timeline now and again. You are aware of it's death. The disparity is noticeable but not major, you can enjoy the good food quite happily. Let's say you gain the same physical benefits either way.

If I get the same physical benefits, from the same amount of food, then yeah I'd go with the good food.

But another important question: is the dog tortured or abused or in some way grossly mistreated before dying? Or does it die a swift, painless death?

Or does it die in a series of successive orgasms that overcome its brain through sheer pleasure until death arrives?