Darth Maul vs Vitiate's Sith Empire

Started by Azronger3 pages

Darth Maul vs Vitiate's Sith Empire

The meaning of "deadly" is the ability to cause death.

Darth Maul is proof that the Sith are deadlier than ever.

Therefore, Darth Maul's ability to cause death is higher than the Sith have ever possessed.

But note, this quote isn't restricted to singular Sith. It encompasses any instances Sith have wielded the ability to cause death, meaning amped characters are fair game, as well as the Sith faction as a whole, and also instances when the Sith have owned superweapons.

So who wins between Darth Maul and Vitiate's Empire, given that the former's ability to cause death is higher than the latter's?

Wrath kills him.

Originally posted by The.D0minator

Looks like Maul wins

Originally posted by Haschwalth
Wrath kills him.

Maul's ability to cause death is higher than the Wrath's though, so he's probably a more efficient killer. It would therefore make no sense to declare the Wrath the victor over Maul.

Originally posted by Azronger
Maul's ability to cause death is higher than the Wrath's though, so he's probably a more efficient killer. It would therefore make no sense to declare the Wrath the victor over Maul.

You are so amusing when you troll.
Either that, or you need ILS to tutor you in Logic/context.

He would probably beat anybody in the games one on one aside from people like Valkorion, Nihilus, and maybe Revan.

Originally posted by LordOfTheLight
maybe Revan.

kek

Originally posted by LordOfTheLight
He would probably beat anybody in the games one on one aside from people like Valkorion, Nihilus, and definitely Revan.

I fixed it

Nox kills Maul tbh

Originally posted by darthbane77
Nox kills Maul tbh
Originally posted by Azronger
Maul's ability to cause death is higher than Nox's though, so he's probably a more efficient killer. It would therefore make no sense to declare Nox the victor over Maul.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
kek

Got anymore gems like this quote in store?

Originally posted by Haschwalth
You are so amusing when you troll.
Either that, or you need ILS to tutor you in Logic/context.

Oh, I'd be greatly interested in what ILS has to say.

Originally posted by Azronger
"deadlier than ever" is a general indicator, it's not a direct statement of "Maul is greater than any Sith before him."

Maul being proof that the Sith are deadlier than ever does mean that Maul is deadler than any prior Sith, yes.

TPM Maul > Plagueis, meaning that TPM Sidious would absolutely stomp Plagueis

🙂

Originally posted by Azronger
Maul being proof that the Sith are deadlier than ever does mean that Maul is deadler than any prior Sith, yes.
Deadlier in general, not deadlier than every Sith before him.

Originally posted by The.D0minator
TPM Maul > Plagueis, meaning that TPM Sidious would absolutely stomp Plagueis

Plagueis was alive during that time, so unfortunately no.