I like art. So here's another copy.
The professor's statement was potentially meaningful, even if disrespectful oer your beliefs.
What you said is both disrespectful and utterly pointless.Personally, I leave the dead be, but if people are of the mind that historic truth > reverence for the dead, I respect that.
Bush wasn't literally a war criminal but his greed for iraqi oil led to the death of 288,000 people.
We also know that people's behavior is a result of
A. Genes.
B. How you are raised.
A child's failure is a parent's failure.
I'll need to research if it's fair for bush to be called a racist, but alas, you didn't bother addressing or contesting the criticisms.
Main reason why this is controversial isn't because what she said, but because bush was famous. Personally, I don't think being related to powerful warrants people not holding you accountable, but hey, maybe that's just me.
Originally posted by Robtard
Um, you're the proven liar here on KMC, sport.
You just said I want her fired or placed on leave.
Prove it. Remember: the unwritten rule is you prove statements you make.
And there will be no "you implied it!" here.
Show me saying she needs to be fired or put on leave. Or you just lied. And you know the penalty for lying...
Originally posted by Surtur
You just said I want her fired or placed on leave.Prove it. Remember: the unwritten rule is you prove statements you make.
You never prove yours and claim you can't be bothered to search for quotes. So it's very poor form for you to insist others do what you yourself refuse to do.
Then again, you're the forum's most prolific hypocrite so this behavior is both expected from you and laughed at.
Originally posted by Robtard
You never prove yours and claim you can't be bothered to search for quotes. So it's very poor form for you to insist others do what you yourself refuse to do.Then again, you're the forums most prolific hypocrite so this behavior is both expected from you and laughed at.
You just said I want her fired or put on leave.
Either prove it or you just lied.
Originally posted by Robtard
Rocky literally says 'Bush isn't a war criminal' in that post, so you're being your dishonest self again, which you're known for.
Actually he said Bush isn't a literal war criminal. Which implies he is in some way a war criminal.
Yet the reason Rocky gave didn't show that lol.
Now, show me your evidence I wanted the teacher fired.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
I like art. So here's another copy.Maybe someone wants to address it rather than avoid shit that makes them uncomfortable
I sent you a few questions. Maybe you should reply?
Originally posted by Nibedicus
........Meaningful? In what way and in what context? Pls elaborate.
And accurate? Pls provide proof of:
1) Bush being factually a war criminal.
2) Barbara Bush was an "amazing racist".So are you now saying that it is now ok to attack parents for the sins of their children?
Edit. Oh, and I notice you sneakily edited out "accurate". Too bad I was able to quote you on it. Does this mean that you are taking back the "accuracy" of her statements?
Originally posted by Surtur
"Bush wasn't literally a war criminal but his greed for iraqi oil led to the death of 288,000 people. "
Rocky: "Bush is not a war criminal"
Surtur: "So you're saying Bush is a war criminal!"
Yeah, your autism is acting up hard today and it's only Tuesday. Have a rough weekend again?
Originally posted by Robtard
Rocky: "Bush is not a war criminal"Surtur: "So you're saying Bush is a war criminal!"
Yeah, your autism is acting up hard today and it's only Tuesday. Have a rough weekend again?
Lol...he says "he wasn't LITERALLY a war criminal".
How else should one interpret that sentence as saying he is some sort of "figurative" war criminal? Or that he is just as bad as a war criminal?
One more time: where is the evidence I wanted the professor fired?