Incels and violence

Started by Robtard5 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Sure you did, here is the quote.
Yeah, that's not me saying his use of the word is wrong, I'm saying he's not a "senpai" in my use of the word and the following sentence indicates how I meant it.

Still not sure if you're having an honest reading comprehension failure moment (it happens) or if you know what I was saying but you're in 'time-waster-troll mode again.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, that's not me saying his use of the word is wrong, I'm saying he's not a "senpai" in my use of the word and the following sentence indicates how I meant it.

Still not sure if you're having an honest reading comprehension failure moment (it happens) or if you know what I was saying but you're in 'time-waster-troll mode again.

Sure it is.

BTW, nice attempt to save face by going, "if you disagree with me you're just being a time-waster-troll."

Ah, you're in time-waster-troll mode. Okay then. Have your last word, I allow it.

See, I called it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Well EXCUSE-meeee, sensitive one with the brown belt; that's doodoo coloured btw; you're a doodoo belt.

Senpai means "master" and often used thay way, it also became a sort of meme, where I was at since we're on the interwebs. YW.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're the guy who just pmed me saying the best thing about a 12 year old boy is you can flip him over and imagine he's a 12 year old girl.

That doesn't even make sense, it's the other way around.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

Ha, nice.

In thread related news, if you google "incel" now, you get multiple stories discussing the subculture of these sexless women hating pathetic men.

-Raw hatred’: why the 'incel' movement targets and terrorises women

-What Is an 'Incel?' Violent Misogynist Subculture Referenced by Toronto Van Attack Suspect Explained

-Incel, the misogynist ideology that inspired the deadly Toronto attack, explained

-Reddit Bans ‘Incel’ Group for Inciting Violence Against Women

Probably a good thing, these losers have the potential to form their own terrorist group if left unchecked, luckily so far most of them seem context being keyboard warriors. But I could see another attack like the one in Toronto or the one in Isla Vista happening.

They target and terrorize women because women don't want anything to do with them and that makes them mad. that and it's easier to give into your rage than it is to acknowledge the problem and work towards fixing it.

That incel group on reddit was genuinely horrific. They were mean, shitty, ugly people who deserved the misery they got.

Originally posted by BackFire
That incel group on reddit was genuinely horrific. They were mean, shitty, ugly people who deserved the misery they got.
Same group you told me about where they'd post stories of how they'd walk in front of women in public and let doors close on them on purpose as a form of 'revenge' and other shitty juvenile behavior?

Yep. Many of them also believed that women should be assigned to men as property, they wanted The Handmaid's Tale to be real. They were warped beyond repair.

What a sad pathetic lot. They'll just migrate to MGTOW or another similar sight.

Speaking of though, Season2 of Handmaid's started today I think. Great show.

Yeah I watched them last night. Best show currently on TV imo.

Might have to agree with you there, June Osborne does such a fantastic job, love her inner monologues. West World is close though.

I think Alexis Bledel is the highlight of that show for me, really happy they expanded her role this season. She steals every scene she's in and has been involved in some of the most powerful and horrific scenes of the entire series.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, you're in time-waster-troll mode. Okay then. Have your last word, I allow it.

lol, that's dadudemon-level of arrogant smugness.

grouchoawe

Originally posted by dadudemon
lol, that's dadudemon-level of arrogant smugness.

grouchoawe

At least yours is usually earned, he was clearly saying that kurk's use of the word was wrong and then went into excuse/semantic mode when I correctly called him on it and provided the proof via his quote.

Originally posted by dadudemon
lol, that's dadudemon-level of arrogant smugness.

grouchoawe

The last sentence, absolutely. The first sentence is factual.

Originally posted by Robtard
Turner does make a compelling argument, but I have to disagree overall. He does correctly point out that Daniel wasn't so squeaky clean himself and quite the dick himself though.

i don't subscribe to his idiotic notion that daniel was the bully. he arrived at his conclusion by casually glossing over some 'minor' details like johnny stalking his ex gf and later pretty much attempting to murder daniel. johnny was the much shittier shit, but daniel was still a shit.

We agree. Touch penises now?