IM w/ nanosuit vs. regular Thor

Started by StiltmanFTW22 pages

He was literally crushing Tony's armor with his grip, that's not "holding back".

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
He was literally crushing Tony's armor with his grip, that's not "holding back".

And yet, Thor wasnt winning. It was more like a tie.

Now comparing the Mk.6 suit to the latest one is like comparing a chihuahua with a pitbull.

Spoiler:
Not to mention that the nanosuit was able to piss Thanos up whilst Thanos was mocking Thor and Hulk on the ship.

If Thor is strong enough to crush the armor in his bare hands( he is)and yet wasn't doing major damage when hitting it with Mjolnir. It's very clear that he was holding back during those hits.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If Thor is strong enough to crush the armor in his bare hands( he is)and yet wasn't doing major damage when hitting it with Mjolnir. It's very clear that he was holding back during those hits.

Crushing and striking are two different things dude.

Lol!!!!

Thor held back against IM and Hulk in Avengers.

That's Adam Grimes', and therefore kmc's, canon.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Crushing and striking are two different things dude.

Correct. Striking is much more powerful than crushing with your grip.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Thor held back against IM and Hulk in Avengers.

That's Adam Grimes', and therefore kmc's, canon.

Your canon name is Reflassshh.

Adam Grimes is from a very disappointing What if, in which he gets turned into a stinking thorbag against his will 🙁

Thor wrecks the hell out of any IM.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Correct. Striking is much more powerful than crushing with your grip.

No it aint. And materials react differently to such.

IM wins period

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Thor wrecks the hell out of any IM.

Another Thor-Cock-Sucker? Damn you reproduce like rats.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Thor held back against IM and Hulk in Avengers.

That's Adam Grimes', and therefore kmc's, canon.

Dont make me Laugh! Go watch the movie again fellow.

And with Hulk he was holding back initially.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No it aint. And materials react differently to such.

Really? You think you can crush a 1-inch thick wood panel in your grip and yet somehow not be able to crack through it with a hammer?

A man can easily break another man's ankle by stomping on it, does that mean they can easily crush it in their grip?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Really? You think you can crush a 1-inch thick wood panel in your grip and yet somehow not be able to crack through it with a hammer?

A man can easily break another man's ankle by stomping on it, does that mean they can easily crush it in their grip?

Thats a fallacy!

1. Put a can on top of your table and punch it laterally. Can even use a hammer. The can will fly away and fall on the floor with little damage.

Then, with your hand you can crush it with less effort.

2. Grab a baseball and with a bat hit it with all your strenght. It will fly away

Use the same ball and using a hammer hit it against the ground ( simulating a crushing force) and it will burst.

You cant compare crushing and striking. Just like you cant compare crushing and tearing

That is a fallacy.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thats a fallacy!

1. Put a can on top of your table and punch it laterally. Can even use a hammer. The can will fly away and fall on the floor with little damage.

Then, with your hand you can crush it with less effort.

2. Grab a baseball and with a bat hit it with all your strenght. It will fly away

Use the same ball and using a hammer hit it against the ground ( simulating a crushing force) and it will burst.

[B] You cant compare crushing and striking. Just like you cant compare crushing and tearing

That is a fallacy. [/B]

Wow. Just... wow. You can't seriously be this stupid can you?

First of all, we are talking about Thor striking with Mjolnir vs. Thor crushing IM's armor in his grip. In. his. grip.

Nowhere in your examples did you even mention anything regarding crushing something in a grip.

Your (invalid) example of "crushing" was about a can that got crushed via a strike. So you ended up just proving that a strike was capable of crushing the can as long as it had a back stop. That's still a strike and in no way comparable to Thor crushing something in his grip.

So if you want your argument to actually be relevant, please show me an example of someone crushing something in their grip that's way tougher than they can damage with a strike from a hammer.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Wow. Just... wow. You can't seriously be this stupid can you?

First of all, we are talking about Thor striking with Mjolnir vs. Thor crushing IM's armor in his grip. In. his. grip.

Nowhere in your examples did you even mention anything regarding crushing something in a grip.

Your (invalid) example of "crushing" was about a can that got crushed via a strike. So you ended up just proving that a strike was capable of crushing the can as long as it had a back stop. That's still a strike and in no way comparable to Thor crushing something in his grip.

So if you want your argument to actually be relevant, please show me an example of someone crushing something in their grip that's way tougher than they can damage with a strike from a hammer.

Okay lets stop the BS!

Thor did strike IM's suit and didn't damaged him! PERIOD. Whatever else you want to claim is MERE SPECULATION.

Nano Suit IM beats your lover whether you like it OR NOT!

Also, Thanos actually got pissed off from fighting Iron Man whilst he was laughing at Thor in the ship! Conclusion: Iron Man put a better fight than your man!

Sorry to break your illusions.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Okay lets stop the BS!

Thor did strike IM's suit and didn't damaged him! PERIOD. Whatever else you want to claim is MERE SPECULATION.

Nano Suit IM beats your lover whether you like it OR NOT!

Also, Thanos actually got pissed off from fighting Iron Man whilst he was laughing at Thor in the ship! Conclusion: Iron Man put a better fight than your man!

Sorry to break your illusions.

Yes, Thor didn't damage IM with a strike... because he was taking it easy on the guy. Unless you want to claim that Thor's grip is somehow more damaging than a full Mjolnir hit from Thor? Or that a headbutt from Thor is more damaging than a full hit from Mjolnir?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes, Thor didn't damage IM with a strike... because he was taking it easy on the guy. Unless you want to claim that Thor's grip is somehow more damaging than a full Mjolnir hit from Thor? Or that a headbutt from Thor is more damaging than a full hit from Mjolnir?

Do you have evidence or only "Speculation"?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes, Thor didn't damage IM with a strike... because he was taking it easy on the guy. Unless you want to claim that Thor's grip is somehow more damaging than a full Mjolnir hit from Thor? Or that a headbutt from Thor is more damaging than a full hit from Mjolnir?

We shall never know.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Do you have evidence or only "Speculation"?

Yes, I have evidence.

Fact 1. A strike with a hammer is more destructive than a person's grip.
Fact 2. Majority of Thor's most destructive feats were accomplished by either a Mjolnir strike, a lightning strike, or a charged hammer strike. Not via him crushing something in his grip.
Fact 3. Thor's hammer strikes against IM had minimal damage on IM's armor whereas Thor had no difficulty crushing said armor in his grip.

Those are all facts. Which means the only logical conclusion is:

Thor was not hitting IM with Mjolnir with his full strength.

Now, are you going to backup your statements with proof or are you going to continue speculating?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
We shall never know.

So you're saying Thor's grip is more destructive than a strike from Mjolnir? Gotcha.