Originally posted by Nibedicus
It doesn't seem that way to me, tbh. I think it's more of a jab towards the people who downplay the impact of rape accusations and argumentation towards the potential for damage relative to an actual rape. And the need to address the damage caused by such in a commensurate (to the damage) manner.But I am mostly unaware of the true personalities and intentions of the posters here so I might be mistaken and it might be really just baiting for the sake of baiting and I do acknowledge the possibility of that seeing as how these forums are.
Still an interesting thought experiment/discussion (if it goes smoothly), tho, IMO.
Who downplays the affects of false rape allegations on the falsely accused?
False rape allegations are complete shit and imo, there should be harsher penalties when it's proven that someone's been falsely accused and had to go through trial to prove their innocence, but I'm not aware of people who go something like "meh, who cares, it's no big deal".