Thanos vs. Kurse & Abomination

Started by Josh_Alexander9 pages
Originally posted by FrothByte
He's projecting. He's obviously obsessed with cocks and can't seem to stop talking about them.

Not more than you guys are with Thor's one! 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Am saying there are no feats of IG's blast. And when reality was changed there wasn't a beam coming out!

It's clear that the attacks of the IG vary and aren't all the same!

Furthermore, Thanos was surprised and didn't had time to prepare a good defense or use the gauntlet properly.

So you're saying Thanos's blast from the completed IG is just as weak/strong as Vision's blast?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Not more than you guys are with Thor's one! 😂

Sure Josh, sure. I understand it's hard for you to talk about your obsession so you naturally lash out at others...

Originally posted by FrothByte
He's projecting. He's obviously obsessed with cocks and can't seem to stop talking about them.

They do appear to be on of his favorite topics.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So you're saying Thanos's blast from the completed IG is just as weak/strong as Vision's blast?

So are you saying that the IG can't replicate the heat/power of a Neutron Star!?

Boy, just admit that SB ain't invulnerable!

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
So are you saying that the IG can't replicate the heat/power of a Neutron Star!?

Boy, just admit that SB ain't invulnerable!

Sure it can. Which all the more proves just how durable SB is to withstand a sustained IG blast.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Sure it can.

Thanks for the concession. Which means SB ain't invulnerable.

As i said, IG's blast or laser isn't much different to a Laser from the Mind Stone or Tesseract.

You think a blast from a complete IG isn't much different from the blast of a single stone?

So clearly Thor must have just punched through Thanos then, given SB apparently isnt all that tough.

Thanos fanboys are almost as dumb as the Hulk fanboys. Oh wait, the Hulk fanboys already converted.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanks for the concession. Which means SB ain't invulnerable.

As i said, [B] IG's blast or laser isn't much different to a Laser from the Mind Stone or Tesseract. [/B]

How did you get "SB ain't invulnerable" from me saying "The IG can replicate the heat of a neutron star"?

It seems some people are assuming that SB can be destroyed by the heat of a star, because it's base metals/materials were melted by a star during its construction; that is faulty logic. Eitri's completed weapons are obviously more powerful than the raw materials from which they were crafted.

There's nothing to indicate that SB is invulnerable, but we've seen it shrug away a blast from all 6 stones with contemptuous ease, so it it stands to reason that whatever can destroy SB, has to be more powerful than a blast from all 6 stones. That or a special SB destroying ability of some kind.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You think a blast from a complete IG isn't much different from the blast of a single stone?

Without feats to back IG's beam the debate is useless.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So clearly Thor must have just punched through Thanos then, given SB apparently isnt all that tough.

Thanos fanboys are almost as dumb as the Hulk fanboys. Oh wait, the Hulk fanboys already converted.

I never said it wasn't though. Nor did i ever made the Thor-Cock-Sucking comment of calling it Invulnerable

Originally posted by FrothByte
How did you get "SB ain't invulnerable" from me saying "The IG can replicate the heat of a neutron star"?

Was the subject being debated with Darth Thor when you decided to quote me and debate my points.

Originally posted by Robtard
It seems some people are assuming that SB can be destroyed by the heat of a star, because it's base metals/materials were melted by a star during its construction; that is faulty logic. Eitri's completed weapons are obviously more powerful than the raw materials from which they were crafted.

There's nothing to indicate that SB is invulnerable, but we've seen it shrug away a blast from all 6 stones with contemptuous ease, so it it stands to reason that whatever can destroy SB, has to be more powerful than a blast from all 6 stones. That or a special SB destroying ability of some kind.

Is there evidence that somehow Jarnbjorn got stronger than base Uru?

It's like saying a wooden chair woudn't born just cause it's a chair. Unless evidence is brought, it ain't more durable than the base wood it was constructed from.

We know the IG is more powerful with all the stones than it is with just 1.

Originally posted by Silent Master
We know the IG is more powerful with all the stones than it is with just 1.

Overall ofcourse.

But a Gauntlet blast has no feats, and therefore we can just infer such based on logic not feats.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Was the subject being debated with Darth Thor when you decided to quote me and debate my points.

Is there evidence that somehow Jarnbjorn got stronger than base Uru?

It's like saying a wooden chair woudn't born just cause it's a chair. Unless evidence is brought, it ain't more durable than the base wood it was constructed from.

Stormbreaker has the power of Bifrost. Uru in itself doesn't have that power, which means it's obvious that there was something special in how SB was molded which granted it powers.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Was the subject being debated with Darth Thor when you decided to quote me and debate my points.

Is there evidence that somehow Jarnbjorn got stronger than base Uru?

It's like saying a wooden chair woudn't born just cause it's a chair. Unless evidence is brought, it ain't more durable than the base wood it was constructed from.

For one, we can safely assume that a blast from all 6 stones is more powerful than a star (as shown in that scene)

That's a faulty comparison. eg Steel/iron is tempered and made stronger during the smelting and forging processes.

There's also no indication that a block of base uru can bestow powers such as flight or call the Bifrost, so there's a lot more going on in the creation process than just melting and molding, there's magic and/or super-advanced-tech.

edit: Frost ninja'd my points, see above

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Overall ofcourse.

But a Gauntlet blast has no feats, and therefore we can just infer such based on logic not feats.

Would logic not dictate 6 stones > 1?

Originally posted by Robtard
For one, we can safely assume that a blast from all 6 stones is more powerful than a star.

That's a faulty comparison. eg Steel is tempered and made stronger during the smelting and forging processes.

There's also no indication that a block of base uru can bestow powers such as flight or call the Bifrost, so there's a lot more going on in the creation process than just melting and molding, there's magic and/or super-advanced-tech.

edit: Frost ninja'd my points, see above

Safely? Based on what feat?

Jarnbjorn wasn't forged. Uru was just forged and allowed to solidify on a mold to later be assembled with a stick.

It could be the only viable point you have until now...The magic thing.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Would logic not dictate 6 stones > 1?

Yes, but by how much? No feats to answer such question.

No reason to believe Mjolnir couldn't have taken such force or that Cap's shield couldn't block it.

So it's pretty much a useless thing to debate.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And yet survived to make it the biggest feat of durability in the MCU. 😂

A Kree General. The Kree are among the most powerful Alien Races, and are fearless. Yet even Ronan trembled before Thanos.

So consider your words.

You mean when he snapped Thanos henchmens neck right in front of him and was talking shit or when he got the stone and told Thanos to screw off?