Invincible Vs Invincible Iron Man

Started by riv66722 pages

Invincible Vs Invincible Iron Man

No prep.
No BFR.

Invincible should take this 8-9/10

Invincible but he's going to work for it.

Originally posted by tkitna
Invincible but he's going to work for it.
doubtful, he's significantly faster than tony.

Good point.
Tony’s armor ever track fast moving objects? Anyone?

Well that was the purpose behind Extremis.

I recall him shooting a bunch of missiles out of the air via his computer aiming and moving the arms at superspeed. Bit of a one-off, though. Mind you, Iron Man is a lot like Star Trek, in that he has lots of different one-offs.

Iron Man might be too versatile for this.

I remain undecided.

Mark stats outweigh IM own by alot. Durable enough to be compared to most high tiers too. Then there is the speed advantage and willing to kill that Mark shows.

Yeah, Robot only beat him by utilising that special metal.

Otherwise.....I mean, has it ever been explained how Iron Man's durability works? He's still limited by the materials he uses (not talking about forcefields).

So even the strongest metal known to man is still going to be pretty weak by comic standards, no?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yeah, Robot only beat him by utilising that special metal.

Otherwise.....I mean, has it ever been explained how Iron Man's durability works? He's still limited by the materials he uses (not talking about forcefields).

So even the strongest metal known to man is still going to be pretty weak by comic standards, no?

You kinda answered your own question: it's reinforced by a magnetic force-field.

Ironman can take this, especially if he use this attack...

Originally posted by carver9
Ironman can take this, especially if he use this attack...

he used almost all of his energy on that one attack. He'd need to hit Mark first btw, and we both know that he's hilariously outclassed in speed.

Needs to be said:

Invincible survived in the sun. 😛

Originally posted by VanMae
You kinda answered your own question: it's reinforced by a magnetic force-field.

So is that it, he has a magnetic FF and that's it?

Originally posted by cdtm
Needs to be said:

Invincible survived in the sun. 😛

For a little while. It was going to kill him though.

Originally posted by tkitna
For a little while. It was going to kill him though.
still longer than iron man.

Guys, this is comics. Are we really saying "hur dur Invincible > any metal" like Tony's durability makes any real-world sense in relation to metallic strength? That's not even lowballing. It's more like changing the variables of the contest, but only for one combatant.

On speed, I'm not up on current IM, but I know at least Extremis had some picsecond feats. I think Tony loses eventually, but I don't think this is the insta-kill argument that others might.

I'm cool with Invincible winning via physical attrition, even up to 10/10. That's probably how this fight goes. But let's not pretend he'd rip open Tony like Popeye with a can of spinach in some two-panel non-fight.

No one is saying that.

I was just asking if it was ever explained....

Originally posted by riv6672
Good point.
Tony’s armor ever track fast moving objects? Anyone?

Living Laser