Can JL Superman Tank Hulks Leviathan Punch?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Actually, the facts are
1) Kyle never said those were the numbers he used in his equation
2) Using those numbers would not generate his result

Conclusions 1) all facts point to those numbers not being the ones he used. 2) H1 is very dishonest and is likely a liar

1) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers though.
2) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers along with the formula to calculate the result.

Conclusion, I don't see why in hell he would provide us with numbers that he didn't use. Therefore, it's possible that he could have used the numbers he provided and made a mistake.

Originally posted by h1a8
1) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers though.
2) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers along with the formula to calculate the result.

Conclusion, I don't see why in hell he would provide us with numbers that he didn't use. Therefore, it's possible that he could have used the numbers he provided and made a mistake.

h1. Honestly, why are you afraid of the BZ?

This is for everyone to see. This is what I posted on page 9 (not page 8).

Originally posted by h1a8
He made several errors
1. He claims a neutron star is 1/4 as luminous as the Sun (he writes this on the screen with 0.25Lo) then says that means that a neutron star emits 1/4 the power that the sun does.
But this contradicts the equation
Power = 4pi*r^2*sigma*T^4.
Plugging in r=10^4m and T=600,000k (not 10^6 k) for neutron star in the power equation and
R=6.957x10^8m and T=5778k for Sun in the power equation gives
The power of a neutron star is 0.024 times that (not 1/4 of) of the Sun.

2. The ratio of the amount of power that Thor was getting hit with and the total power output of a neutron star should be the same ratio as the cross sectional area of Thor and the total surface area of a neutron star. This ratio is
R=1.4/[4pi(10^4)^2]= 1.11e-9 (assuming Thor is 2m x 0.7m rectangle)

So Thor experienced 0.024 x 1.11e-9 = 2.67e-11 times the power of the Sun.
Thor had it opened for less than 60s (from the timestamp).
So Thor tanked less than 2.67e-11 x 3.828e26 x 60s = 6.14e17 J of heat energy.
Very impressive.

I initially plugged in 600,000k and 10km to show that his result was wrong. I used 600,000k instead of 10^6k because that was the amount from the source I found (from many years old neutron star). His source also gives 600,000k as well.

I initial thought he plugged in the wrong value (10^6k) to get his result.
In other words, I thought his error was a conceptual one, and not a math error. Later I plugged in the value he provided (10^6) and found that this gives 0.186 and still not his result. Therefore I concluded that he made a math error. Either way, he made a math error or a conceptual one.

The second error, which Silent and Nibedicus are not addressing, is that Thor blocked a portion of the total energy that came through. Science guy takes the entire cross sectional area of the opened hatch to calculate how much energy was used to melt the metal. That result is faulty due to Thor blocking a portion of it. It's also faulty for any member here to assume Thor tanked all that energy when a good portion wasn't blocked at all (went to heat the metal).

However, let’s not forget this gem on page 8 that got everything started:

Originally posted by h1a8
If the temperature of the beam Thor got hit with is 100 then the hv could range from 50 to 70. It usually take many seconds to melt steel.

Already challenged h1 to a BZ, he won’t accept it because he knows no one will buy his BS.

And keep piling up the stories h1. Gathering great material for the BZ.

@nibedicus
This is what I believe, honestly. Here is my reasoning.
In welding, the temperature of a welding arc can be above that of the surface of the Sun. But using a welding arc, it would take a very long time to melt the amount of steel Superman did.
Superman did it in a matter of a few seconds, a quick swipe basically.
Therefore the temperature of the hv had to be at least several times greater than a welding arc.

Google heat energy vs temperature pls and stop spreading misinformation.

Originally posted by h1a8
@nibedicus
This is what I believe, honestly. Here is my reasoning.
In welding, the temperature of a welding arc can be above that of the surface of the Sun. But using a welding arc, it would take a very long time to melt the amount of steel Superman did.
Superman did it in a matter of a few seconds, a quick swipe basically.
Therefore the temperature of the hv had to be at least several times greater than a welding arc.

Uru Metal》》》》》》》Steel.

Star/Neutron Star》》》》Supe's HV.

Originally posted by h1a8
1) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers though.
2) This is a fact. But he provides the numbers along with the formula to calculate the result.

Conclusion, I don't see why in hell he would provide us with numbers that he didn't use. Therefore, it's possible that he could have used the numbers he provided and made a mistake.

Thank you for admitting those were facts.

Conclusion, you have zero proof that he made several math errors.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Google heat energy vs temperature pls and stop spreading misinformation.

They are correlated.
The higher the temperature the higher the heat energy.
The higher the heat energy the higher the temperature.
For any substance, temperature translates to how much heat energy is within it.

You would melt steel faster with an 30,000° welding arc than a 6,000° welding arc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thank you for admitting those were facts.

Conclusion, you have zero proof that he made several math errors.

Stop saying proof. I have evidence.
Give me a logical reason of him providing numbers that he didn't use?

Originally posted by h1a8
Stop saying proof. I have evidence.
Give me a logical reason of him providing numbers that he didn't use?

Kyle did not provide the numbers he used in his equation, you're being disingenuous.

H1 didn’t know that it is heat energy (measured in joules)and not temperature that determines the speed of heat transfer.

Temperature is just the average kinetic energy within an object’s molecules.

Instead of doing the respectable thing and admitting he erred, he weasels and tries to excuse his ignorance with BS:

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Heat_vs_temperature

This is why people don’t respect him.

Also, he doesn’t seem to know how to read:

Originally posted by h1a8
For any substance, temperature translates to how much heat energy is within it.

An object can gain heat or lose heat, but it cannot have heat. Heat is a measure of change, never a property possessed by an object or system.

H1 has no honor and no balls. He’s someone I despise.

Heat energy
Not heat

Read nibedicus read!

Originally posted by Silent Master
Kyle did not provide the numbers he used in his equation, you're being disingenuous.

Originally posted by h1a8
maybe, but if so then why?

Why what? Your question makes no sense.

Originally posted by Silent Master

Why what? Your question makes no sense.

Why did he provide numbers that he didn’t use?

He didn't provide any numbers for his equation.

Originally posted by h1a8
Heat energy
Not heat

Read nibedicus read!

/shrug

Will admit I missed the “energy” part. Will retract that one.

See? That is what mature ppl do.

My point prior still stands.