Originally posted by h1a8Prove Superman is stronger. Prove something. This is just sad at this point.
Just like Quan. Lowballing the guy you want to lose and highball the guy you want to win.FYI, it's not a low showing that Zod got his neck broke by someone stronger than Thanos. Also you are ignoring the speed advantage too.
Originally posted by h1a8
Just like Quan. Lowballing the guy you want to lose and highball the guy you want to win.FYI, it's not a low showing that Zod got his neck broke by someone stronger than Thanos. Also you are ignoring the speed advantage too.
Are you upset that other people are using your tactics?
Originally posted by h1a8Prove Superman is stronger. Thanos' absolute destruction of Hulk is more impressive than anything Superman has done. Superman got Ko'd by a Nuc. Thor's neutron star feat is easily more impressive than that. Thanos also beat the hell out of Thor, though we didn't see it on screen. If we go by the Thor vs Superman thread it's pretty evenly split. So if Thanos dismantled Thor and Hulk it stands to reason he beats a guy that got his neck snapped by Superman.
Just like Quan. Lowballing the guy you want to lose and highball the guy you want to win.FYI, it's not a low showing that Zod got his neck broke by someone stronger than Thanos. Also you are ignoring the speed advantage too.
So punching someone far and not really doing any significant damage is more impressive than beating the shit out of the Hulk who easily stopped a Leviathan in its tracks. Feats are cool but don’t prove anything in regards to who is stronger than who. Just because Thor has the neutron feat that doesn’t mean he’s suddenly stronger than the Hulk because he doesn’t have a feat to match that. It’s how the characters stack up not the feats alone and brutalizing the Hulk is far more impressive than a drawn out fight with Zod that got his neck snapped.
Originally posted by RobtardAnd the strength to casually jump at a leviathan is an insane strength feat. Leviathan is massive. Thanos beat the guy to a pulps. He overpowered him to boot. The directors acknowledged Thanos is stronger than the Hulk. Feats don’t determine superiority comparisons do. Thanos showed he’s stronger than the Hulk.
The amount of force required to punch 200lbs (or so) flying up that high and that fast isn't some little thingAs is picking up and carry an apartment building
Same goes with dragging a super-tanker on it's side, those things are massive
Originally posted by RobtardFeats don’t determine superiority. That’s my point. Thor’s neutron feat shits on anything Superman has done but I don’t believe he’s physically stronger. I’m consistent but if you’re just a feat guy you have to say Thor is leap years ahead of Superman. I bet you don’t which shows inconsistency.
Jumping several stories high is very impressive, but it isn't more impressive than say casually carrying an apartment building though
Hulk has cool feats but what’s impressive is Thanos beating the brakes off him. Neither Superman nor Zod beat the shit out of either. Superman got in a better position and had the leverage to snap an equals neck.
Originally posted by RobtardNo, I’m using Thanos over the Hulk. Feats do play a part but it’s how the characters stack up. We factor in everything not just the feats.
Yet you're using feats to determine that Thanos, Thor, Hulk are superior...
If Superman didn’t beat the ever living shit out of WW do you really expect Zod to have a chance against someone who beat the shit out of the Hulk who is a long stronger than WW.
Originally posted by RobtardI said comparisons matter more than feats. Feats do factor in but we see Hulk is physically stronger than Thor so despite any future feats from Thor we know how they match up against each other strength wise already.
Thanos beating Hulk is a both a strength feat and fighting feat, so yes, you're using feats to prove [in your mind] that Thanos is superior here. Which is fine, as we've always used feats to determine these matches.
Robtard, you're wasting your effort. Whoever quanchi supports is always the one who would lose, didn't you know that?
Regardless, Zod is on par with Superman, and Superman tanked a nuclear explosion. That's even more impressive than Thor tanking Nidalvedinir(however you spell it). Even if Zod was 1/2 the strength of Superman(which he clearly wasn't, considering they were peers), he'd still lol-stomp Thanos, even with the completed infinity gauntlet.
Zod would slice off Thanos' arm with heat vision before he could even react, giving him an instant win. Even without that, he's demonstrably stronger, more durable, faster and more powerful(energy projection) than Thanos even with all the stones, by HUGE margins.
Zod would rip Thanos in half like a kid torturing an ant on the sidewalk.
Originally posted by SSJGGogetaRegardless, Zod is on par with Superman, and Superman tanked a nuclear explosion. That's even more impressive than Thor tanking Nidalvedinir(however you spell it). Even if Zod was 1/2 the strength of Superman(which he clearly wasn't, considering they were peers), he'd still lol-stomp Thanos, even with the completed infinity gauntlet.
This is not Zod at full power. He can't even fly yet in this match. Plus, Superman never tanked a nuclear explosion.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Superman pulling that Tanker was a ridiculous strength feat as those are in tens of thousands of tons from what I have been able to find.
It's impressive but I don't consider it as impressive as Superman lifting that building. The tanker was being pulled over ice and I assume over water since its hull wasn't fully visible.
In any case, it's no more impressive than the leviathan punch feat. Both are equally impressive.