Originally posted by Baziemarc123how is he being hypocritical when u set up the stipulations of who posts first and when. Then after already taking more time than u stipulated u tried to change the order of the posts that u personally decided on.
Dark, I find it suspicious and hypocritical you give Leo THIS amount of extra time for his post but with me you was rushing
"I will open the thread, and whenever you are ready Baz, you make the first post OK?" -Darksaint pg 6 Friday
"i guess but like i said ill start tomorrow 😮" - Baziemark pg 6 friday
And somehow this - "nahhhh I rather post my argument first, than Leo can see it and rebuttal it, bruh I don't take Leo seriously, he can have an advantage so let's do that."
Turned into this- "would it be cool if leo starts first?"
And giving Leo what amount of extra time? It hasn't even been a full day since your post which took u longer than the entire weekend to get in.
U issued the challenge, u decided the posting order, u stipulated when u were going to make the first post. But all you've done since then is talk trash and make BS excuses. U posted 19 times in this thread alone yesterday, but somehow didn't have time for your bz. WTF?
I know I seems like everyone's against u in here and it's easy to get defensive when that happens, but just look at how you've been acting and consider that it might not be everyone else that's to blame here.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Leo never said he was going first.Leo never said he was going to post on Sat, then later on Sat eve.
Had he done so, I would also be on his case.
This is PRECISELY why I stipulated BOTH of you should send the opening posts in simultaneously. You wanted to go first, so we changed usual practice for you.
Had you agreed to it being simultaneous, then yeah, Leo would be slow and I'd be rushing him.
As it is, YOU were the one who gave him extra time lol, with your request for rule changes.
This guy get it
Originally posted by Raptor22
how is he being hypocritical when u set up the stipulations of who posts first and when. Then after already taking more time than u stipulated u tried to change the order of the posts that u personally decided on."I will open the thread, and whenever you are ready Baz, you make the first post OK?" -Darksaint pg 6 Friday
"i guess but like i said ill start tomorrow 😮" - Baziemark pg 6 friday
And somehow this - "nahhhh I rather post my argument first, than Leo can see it and rebuttal it, bruh I don't take Leo seriously, he can have an advantage so let's do that."
Turned into this- "would it be cool if leo starts first?"
And giving Leo what amount of extra time? It hasn't even been a full day since your post which took u longer than the entire weekend to get in.
U issued the challenge, u decided the posting order, u stipulated when u were going to make the first post. But all you've done since then is talk trash and make BS excuses. U posted 19 times in this thread alone yesterday, but somehow didn't have time for your bz. WTF?
I know I seems like everyone's against u in here and it's easy to get defensive when that happens, but just look at how you've been acting and consider that it might not be everyone else that's to blame here.
As does this guy
Hypocrite
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I left the forum on my phone, you would know that if you ever had one.
So how did your phone not go to sleep ???
You do know when your phone goes to sleep you no longer appear as "watching the site". Same happens when your computer goes to sleep.
As pointed out above you also posted 19 times in this thread before tje deadline you agreed to across many hrs. Guess your left on phone magically did that on its own hunh.
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I charged my point before I went to sleep? common sense leo sock.and I'm still waiting for leo to post, it's been more than 14 hours now
Dark, grow some balls and tell the man to hurry up
Unless you touch your screen the screen goes to sleep and you dont appear as a "watching user" . Apparently you dont have enough common sense to even understand the question. My phone ALWAYS has a tab open here and on CV and on ICT, yet I dont appear as being on line unless I'm actually on that tab WITH an active screen.
Some users arenonly on once a week or can only five time to do bog posts as often unlike yourself Leo didnt commit to a time frame back out then recomit to another then go a day past that. If you hadnt done all that no one would have given a shite about how long it took you. If you had agreed to blind opening posts (which always take a week or more) no one would have cared or even known you were hoking up. You've copped the shite you have because you set yourself up to cop it and to then bag someone for giving us less of a wait than you have when
1. we can actively see they are active 20% of the time you are.
2. They didnt commit to any time frame as you did.
3. They weren't tje one calling out any and all to BZ a particularntooic that said caller should be vastly more prepared for as they should have had an opening prepared before calling out (at least a runndown well in mind)
Why dont you grow up and act with some maturity. You had us wait 4 days after committing to 2 then to another 1 and then call out someone for not even giving us a days wait, who has made no time commitments.
People only called you out after you went past the deadline you agreed and then when you went past the new deadline you.re agreed to
Leo hasn't agreed to a timeline he's not Bound by one, and even if he had we would have given him to the timeline he agreed to before we started calling out. YOU should allow him to go as far past any such deadline as you did. Since none exists thenbas a matter of courtesy he has the same 4 daysnto post that you did without sanction. Its bloody poor form to expect more commitment from your adversary than your willing to give.
Your a hypocrite pure and simple
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
the fact you think im reading all of that salt is funny
There wasnt any salt, I'm not agitated or in anyway upset quite frankly I don't care enough. I just find it immensely funny, pathetic and disrespectful that you can't give a quarter the same consideration you expect others to give you
BTW Leo just made a larger post in a quarter the time you did and is already MILES in front of the debate.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
👆 everyone is having fun.Now there's no deadline for each specific post, as long as we have three each from you guys by the 30th of June. If you or leo think that's not enough time, say it sooner rather than later.
Absolutely. No need to rush
Baz if you really did feel rushed to make that first post, take your time and gather your evidence. Dont be afraid to speak up and say you need longer. No ones gonna have an issue.