Originally posted by Stoic
Chasing that argument to its conclusion would become circular because it's not something that can be proven.
Praxagora being able to release infinite heat is already logically bullshit. No star has an infinite temperature.
Unless the context is referring to both's abilities to release and absorb infinite quantities of heat, in which case it's a moot point because it does nothing to prove Super Skrull can absorb a beam of heat as potent as what Superman can project.
However, a super speed beat down would be easier to prove. It really isn't hype either, it was written, or do you think people should ignore fictitious dialog pertaining to fictitious characters and go on what they believe?
I was mostly just shitting on carver, but sure, Superman could easily win with a superspeed one two buckle my shoe to Kl'rt's chin.
Do you believe people should take all dialogue at face value? Should we take Superboy stating Superman can break the planet in half with a sneeze as empirical evidence?