If you have a link for the Carin interview you are talking about, I'd definitely like to see it. I'm always open to new evidence. The comics themselves do not appear to indicate the kind of strict coherence and consistency with respect to the fine details of Superman's power set or power levels, over long periods, that you suggest. Nor have any of the writer and editor interviews, posts, letters, etc. that I have seen. But I could always be missing something and thus have been wrong.
Originally posted by Pillow Biter'
If you have a link for the Carin interview you are talking about, I'd definitely like to see it. I'm always open to new evidence. The comics themselves do not appear to indicate the kind of strict coherence and consistency with respect to the fine details of Superman's power set or power levels, over long periods, that you suggest. Nor have any of the writer and editor interviews, posts, letters, etc. that I have seen. But I could always be missing something and thus have been wrong.
Heres a snippet of what I rashed Shuruku Demon about last years:
Comics wise, there is no "Jurgens" Superman. or "Stern" Superman. Especially as it relates to DoS. As I proved multiple times. Here is Roger Stern, writer of the novelization and writer of DoS, explaining how the books were written at the time:
vAnd here is Death of Superman being written by collaboration ON VIDEO via the Death and Rebirth of Superman animated DVD:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2Zo7B9RJIM
Check the 4:00 minute mark. DoS was written collarborately. there is no "Stern", "Jurgens", "Simonson" or "Ordway" portrayals of Superman. they are the same Superman portrayal. Period.
Here is Carlin in the letters page making it clear that guest writers storylines were consistent with overall shared co plotting across the books:
.. So now you've been corrected on this. Hopefully you wont continue to do that thing were you pretend your head canon trumps the actual books.
