Originally posted by Rockydonovang
It helps to be informed of what you speak of surt. Give it a try:
https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheetKettle and Pot fam:
https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheetIf you're going to act indignant on the basis of knowledge. Make sure you know what you're talking about.
It's not relevant. If she doesn't have the right to vote, why should she follow laws she had no say in.
That 11 million number seems far too high. And it turns out, my intuition is correct. "Photo ID" appears to be a red herring. It's being used, while not necessary to get a voter's ID, to help inflate that number.
I think a more solid study on this more honest:
And it turns out that more than three million Americans actually don't own a government-issued picture ID. That's according to a recent study by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice.
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/01/146204308/why-millions-of-americans-have-no-government-id
3 million? I can live with that. That's less than 1% of the population. Why is this voting iD thing being blown out of proportion? Why is it being passed off as some huge sort of injustice? It's a bullshit argument.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Wait really? I remember being taught in middle school that "cruel and usual" could be applied to the length of a term or how a court case proceeds. If not, it certainly should be.
Nope, we agree. And you're partially correct. Your particular point applies to minors - if they committed the crimes when minors, it would be cruel and unusual to sentence them to death (or something like that) or to life in prison for non-violent offenses. There was a supreme court case that ruled onthis. And I cannot remember it off the top of my head.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
It has every right to demand you prove your citizenship before you can vote for the laws people in the nation live under.
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/01/1462...o-government-id3 million? I can live with that. That's less than 1% of the population. Why is this voting iD thing being blown out of proportion? Why is it being passed off as some huge sort of injustice? It's a bullshit argument.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
The second ammendement doesn't say you entitled to a gun, it says you have a right to purchase one.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/bear-arms
What's more, if "The government has no right to ask you to pay for a right.", it means they actually shouldn't tax you when you buy one.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
"Can't infringe" doesn't mean it has to "give you" arms to bear.
yes for voting system, proper identification process is highly required. The requirement arises from of point of mistreating of democratic right and also wrong usage of the right as well as define by essay writer in the international journal of democracy.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
It has every right to demand you prove your citizenship before you can vote for the laws people in the nation live under.
👆 👆
Originally posted by Playmaker
No. It says the government can't infringe on your rights to keep and bare arms. The 2A doesn't grant you that right.
Exactly. Our rights come from God. The 2nd amendment just officially declares a right that we already naturally have. Our rights don't come from government, despite what lefties think.
And to the creator of this thread, the United States is a republic, NOT a "democracy."
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
👆 👆Exactly. Our rights come from God. The 2nd amendment just officially declares a right that we already naturally have. Our rights don't come from government, despite what lefties think.
And to the creator of this thread, the United States is a republic, NOT a "democracy."