The Lost Boys of the Alt-Right or as they are called "The Brotherhood of Losers".

Started by Stringer39 pages

Seems Surtur is triggered

Originally posted by Stringer
Seems Surtur is triggered
This thread onviously is something he has negative associations with.

Originally posted by Surtur
They legit worry about incels, etc.

Poor guys.

and then more and more incels started killing people and Jan 6 happened...

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
and then more and more incels started killing people and Jan 6 happened...

How many people did these Jan 6. "Incels" kill, Whirl?

You realize if the alt right is as pervasive as you believe, Kanye West and Nick Fuentes in the White House can be a real possibility..

I don't believe that a remote possibility at all, but the way you talk I wonder if you do.

Originally posted by cdtm
You realize if the alt right is as pervasive as you believe, Kanye West and Nick Fuentes in the White House can be a real possibility..

I don't believe that a remote possibility at all, but the way you talk I wonder if you do.

You say this like you didn't already elect Trump....

Originally posted by truejedi
You say this like you didn't already elect Trump....

Voter apathy. And no one likes Hillary.

I think my point is still made. Don't take for granted that the Republican party won't back a loony.

Originally posted by cdtm
Voter apathy. And no one likes Hillary.

No one liked Clinton, yet she got more votes than Trump… hmm

Originally posted by truejedi
I think my point is still made. Don't take for granted that the Republican party won't back a loony.

Bingo

Remember that study back in 2012 or so that claimed Conservatives are authoritarian?

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/presenting-one-most-humiliating-academic-mistakeshifting.s-ever/

[quote]The authors regret that there is an error in the published version of “Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1), 34–51. The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed. Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response. Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative.

In plain language, they exactly reversed the results. According to the actual results of the study, Liberals are more authoritarian. Conservatives were inclined towards “social desirability.”

The practical result is that the whole thing will now likely disappear down the memory hole. Everyone knows conservatives are the real authoritarians, so this wrong study has to be wrong. Or was the wrong study right? It’s hard to keep up when the “science” keeps shifting.[/quote]