Can Thor replicate Superman's nuke feat?

*Thor has Stormbreaker
Same circumstances as Superman faced in BVS

Fixed the title.

Thor might be able withstand the heat but the blast pressure is something else.

Thor easily replicates

star >> nuke

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor might be able withstand the heat but the blast pressure is something else.

Prove that the pressure of a nuke is greater than that of a neutron star.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor might be able withstand the heat but the blast pressure is something else.

hahahaha

Thor withstood the power of a star....

Thor easily replicates

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
hahahaha

Thor withstood the power of a star....

Thor easily replicates

Temperature/Heat

Originally posted by h1a8
Temperature/Heat

You're a liar.

The movie flat-out stated he withstood the full force of a neutron star.

He didnt really withstand it. He was dying/dead when it was over and needed stormbreaker to revive him. But since this thor has storm breaker, he should be fine.

Sure.

Originally posted by h1a8
Temperature/Heat

we all know you don't watch movies.. it is clearly stated by Eitri

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove that the pressure of a nuke is greater than that of a neutron star.

I don’t have to since that’s irrelevant to the discussion here.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
we all know you don't watch movies.. it is clearly stated by Eitri

1) Thor's feats aren't irrelevant
2) You have consistently said that a writer's intention trumps everything. Per the writer, Thor withstood the full force of a neutron star, not just the heat / temperature.

So, when it comes to things like CW Jimmy Olsen making the million ton key claim, H1 insists it's "undeniable writer's intent for the key to be that heavy, or they wouldn't have added the statement". Yet when it's a character statement that hurts his argument, like the Thor one, it's hyperbole? Lol, okay.

Writer's intention and hyperbole are just buzzwords H1 uses because he thinks it hides his massive bias.

People seem to think Thor tanked the Star feat when in reality he was probably going to die without stormbreaker.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
People seem to think Thor tanked the Star feat when in reality he was probably going to die without stormbreaker.

There's no "probably". He was dying.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
hahahaha

Thor withstood the power of a star....

Thor easily replicates

1. PIS. Thor has nothing remotely comparable, and far too many lesser things that could have hurt/killled him (Like that fall in the Hulk Proof cage.)

2. Even if accepted, It nearly killed him.

Consistency trumps a one off feat that nearly killed him.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
People seem to think Thor tanked the Star feat when in reality he was probably going to die without stormbreaker.

Whilst Supes was just fine after taking a portion of that Nuke right?

Originally posted by cdtm
1. PIS. Thor has nothing remotely comparable,

He does now, so stop whining about it.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
So, when it comes to things like CW Jimmy Olsen making the million ton key claim, H1 insists it's "undeniable writer's intent for the key to be that heavy, or they wouldn't have added the statement". Yet when it's a character statement that hurts his argument, like the Thor one, it's hyperbole? Lol, okay.

Butthurt at its finest.