Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
The US healthcare system is superior to any Single Payer system of comparable size.
I would prefer you delete the "comparable size" qualifier because I don't think anything else out there is of comparable size. Far larger systems exist like China (not single payer). Far smaller systems exist like Singapore's.
In what way is the US Healthcare system superior to any Single Payer or Universal Healthcare systems, out there?
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
[B]Costs of Universal Healthcare:Before diving into the costs of health care, we should at least establish a time horizon for the analysis. Most studies, including the one Sanders, cites on his website use a 10-year gap.
Analyses conducted on the costs of Bernie Sanders healthcare plan:
Friedman: 13.8 trillion(2017-2026)
Thorpe: 24.3 trillion(2017-2026)
Mercatus Center: 27.7 trillion(they refer to this as a conservative estimate, likely more)(2019-2028)
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget: 31 trillion(2017-2026)
Urban Institute(best study): 32 trillion(2017-2026)
...
For the reasons discussed there, I will rely on the Urban Institute as my primary source, when comparing costs.[/B]
Okay, fair.
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
So, in reality, the increase in national health expenditures is close to the one provided in the Urban Institute's study(6.6 trillion). The next two parts will be on healthcare quality and debunking bullshit.
Okay, so what about the United States healthcare costs?
1. As a percent of GDP: 18%
Also, no one uses PPP so that's just nominal GDP, I think. But I could not verify.
2. Per Capita: $10,348
3. Healthcare Outcomes in the United States:
We do anywhere from decent to atrocious compared to our peers:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-healthcare-comparison-20170715-htmlstory.html#
And here's a recent study:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2674671
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, the US is doing very terribly with respect to our spending on healthcare. We should have significantly better outcomes than our peers considering how much more we spend, per capita, right?