Originally posted by NemeBro
There isn't a single game that was nominated that compared to Sekiro and I can think of not a single game released period this year save maybe Disco Elysium that might have deserved it more.
I'm okay with it winning the the Action/Adventure category, But as for Game of year not really.
Originally posted by ares834
It's been a really weak year for games.
I didn't really play alot of new triple A games, Mainly stuck with the retro shooters.
Originally posted by KazenjiNo, I just want you to actually support your statements. You think Sekiro winning game of the year is a load of crap? Bring up another game(s) that were more deserving that came out this year. Even if you brought up some retro indie shooter I've never heard of at least I could respect your willingness to bring out an alternative take and try to support another game as deserving of the award. It is extremely easy to just tear something down and say it isn't as good as people seem to think it is, but far harder to build a game up and talk about why it is better.
Even if i did, I'm sure that you'll mock me being the **** that you are.
I'd have put Katana Zero over most of the GotY noms as well.
Originally posted by Kazenji👇
Load of crap...this game is good but not THAT good.
Originally posted by NemeBro👆
There isn't a single game that was nominated that compared to Sekiro and I can think of not a single game released period this year save maybe Disco Elysium that might have deserved it more.
Originally posted by Khazra RebornCompletely disagree. RE2 was everything Resident Evil should be distilled to perfection. I WISH it was the standard for "by the numbers" shooters.
RE 2 wasn’t that great IMO, most of its praise comes from nostalgia, without that its a by the numbers shooter. Sekiro is way better