JL Doomsday Vs MCU Thanos

Started by NemeBro5 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based off what does Doomsday stomp?
Based off your father getting pegged in the ass by your fat whore of a mother quan my boy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Different attack and common mistake of debaters. It is like saying plugging someones nose is not as forceful as a punch therefore it cannot kill someone. Maw is not as powerful as Thor though he would be more effective against Strange than Thor would be.

A nuke does release an impact force however.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Based off your father getting pegged in the ass by your fat whore of a mother quan my boy.
So more pointless banter from you since it is apparent to all you couldn’t debate to save your skank of a mother or your limp dicked daddy. Doomsday was getting schooled by WW alone. She danced all over this dumb buffoon. Severing limbs, lassoing the the ass while he was a sitting duck. There characters who never worked together two of which just previously almost fought to the death put aside their differences to kill the retard. Thanos is the guy who beats retards up. Bring him back just so Thanos can send him back to the sweet slumber of retard death.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
A nuke does release an impact force however.
So does WWs sword the difference is one cut off a limb one did not. The sword does not contain as much power as a nuke yet more effective against Doomsday. The the lasso which held him in check as there are other more effective attacks than nukes especially against Doomsday. Thanos beats him into submission.

I accept your concession, but not your mother's love. I have standards. 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
So does WWs sword the difference is one cut off a limb one did not. The sword does not contain as much power as a nuke yet more effective against Doomsday. The the lasso which held him in check as there are other more effective attacks than nukes especially against Doomsday. Thanos beats him into submission.

Where did the OP said Thanos had a sword?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Where did the OP said Thanos had a sword?
I am not saying he has a sword I am saying other applications in battle have been more effective than a nuke. If you cannot understand my points you should not debate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not saying he has a sword I am saying other applications in battle have been more effective than a nuke. If you cannot understand my points you should not debate.

Prove Thanos has a cutting edge device in this battle.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I accept your concession, but not your mother's love. I have standards. 👆
You failed to refute any of my points and your fanboyism is not evidence. That is a concession, worm.

Your mother is currently at my feet while I toss dingleberries into her hair.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove Thanos has a cutting edge device in this battle.
I never said he did I said he beats Doomsday into submission. Again if you cannot understand my points of reference ce you should not debate. You are painfully slow.

Doomsday obviously stabs him in the head

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Doomsday obviously stabs him in the head
Nah, Thanos would rip off a bony protrusion and give him the Iron Man business. Good thinking.

Ps. Thanos survives impalements Doomsday does not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said he did I said he beats Doomsday into submission. Again if you cannot understand my points of reference ce you should not debate. You are painfully slow.

You brought the Sword feat in order to counter the Nuke feat, in order to do so you need to proof that Thanos has a cutting device!

OMG! The kinetic impact of a Nuke couldn't kill Doomsday!!!! How do you expect the kinetic impact of Thanos punches to kill DD!?

Proof that Thanos can do that with a piece of bone through the head?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You brought the Sword feat in order to counter the Nuke feat, in order to do so you need to proof that Thanos has a cutting device!

OMG! The kinetic impact of a Nuke couldn't kill Doomsday!!!! How do you expect the kinetic impact of Thanos punches to kill DD!?

I cited that as evidence of something weaker than a nuke having a greater impact on Doomsday not that Thanos would use a sword. This is why no one would ever seriously debate you because you will just repeat nonsense but guess what you will break before I do.

Thanos kos, beats him to death, or impales him with a bony protrusion he rips out of Doomsday.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Proof that Thanos can do that with a piece of bone through the head?
You failed to prove he sticks it in anyones head. Baseless claim just more imaginary debating.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I cited that as evidence of something weaker than a nuke having a greater impact on Doomsday not that Thanos would use a sword. This is why no one would ever seriously debate you because you will just repeat nonsense but guess what you will break before I do.

Thanos kos, beats him to death, or impales him with a bony protrusion he rips out of Doomsday.

They are different attacks! One is a kinetic/thermal/radiation attack while the sword is a cutting one!

If Thanos has a sword, then he is slicing DD in a thousand pieces! But he doesn't! His hand's can't cut! And his punches won't kill DD.

I can agree to K.O or DD getting impaled.

And please Quan! Can't you act maturely?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
They are different attacks! One is a kinetic/thermal/radiation attack while the sword is a cutting one!

If Thanos has a sword, then he is slicing DD in a thousand pieces! But he doesn't! His hand's can't cut! And his punches won't kill DD.

I can agree to K.O or DD getting impaled.

And please Quan! Can't you act maturely?

So Thanos lunch will be different than a nuke so based off your own logic he is more effective since they are entirely different and not comparable.

Prove it.

I will never relent with you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So Thanos lunch will be different than a nuke so based off your own logic he is more effective since they are entirely different and not comparable.

Prove it.

I will never relent with you.

They arent. Both are kinetic impacts.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
They arent. Both are kinetic impacts.
Entirely different attacks. Thanos strength will have an impact just as WWs or Supermans. It is not a nuke. On one hand you say yes he can ko him but then deny his strength can hurt him which leads me to believe you are massively confused not just here but overall in life. A blind man traversing an obstacle course feigning confidence.