Who would be a bigger threat: Thor vs. Superman

So you're backing away from the stance that it can only destroy ice planets?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
If I remember correctly Thor wiped a much bigger city in less time and with a less powerful weapon back in AoU.

You didn't understand that scene, even with Tony carefully explaining what was going on.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I am not saying it wouldn't have distructive capabilities on Earth. What I meant was that the damage output wouldn't be as massive as the one we saw on Jotunheim.

Why not?

Thor's bifrost looks the same as the one on Asgard(or was on Asgard), the question is whether Thor has the capability to turn it all the way up to eleven and direct it like a cannon and keep it going until a planet is destroyed.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Why not?

Because not all planets are the same. A rocky planet like Earth would present to be much tougher than an Ice planet like Jotunheim.

But surely it would be enough to destroy buildings and cause massive damage on the surface.

But destroying an entire planet like Earth... It sounds too much Star Wars to me.

Originally posted by Robtard
You didn't understand that scene, even with Tony carefully explaining what was going on.

Perhaps I didn't. Where is that scene?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Because not all planets are the same. A rocky planet like Earth would present to be much tougher than an Ice planet like Jotunheim.

But surely it would be enough to destroy buildings and cause massive damage on the surface.

But destroying an entire planet like Earth... It sounds too much Star Wars to me.

You do know that ice planets are rocky planets right?

Originally posted by Inhuman
You do know that ice planets are rocky planets right?

I was refering literaly made of rock/minerals etc, not the scientific classification. Yes, an ice planet would fall under the telluric/terrestrial/rocky planet category.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I was refering literaly made of rock/minerals etc, not the scientific classification. Yes, an ice planet would fall under the telluric/terrestrial/rocky planet category.

There are no planets in the universe made of just ice. The Ice Giants planet seen in the Thor movie was a rocky planet like Earth, just with a colder global climate.

Originally posted by Inhuman
There are no planets in the universe made of just ice. The Ice Giants planet seen in the Thor movie was a rocky planet like Earth, just with a colder global climate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrz-NL6MOyw

The planet seems made of Ice. I personally agree though, the core or mantle of the planet would likely be made of rock, however the surface is clearly Ice.

Furthermore, we only see the surface's distruction caused by the bifrost, so whether the core/mantle or lower layers were also afected remains unknown.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Because not all planets are the same. A rocky planet like Earth would present to be much tougher than an Ice planet like Jotunheim.

But surely it would be enough to destroy buildings and cause massive damage on the surface.

But destroying an entire planet like Earth... It sounds too much Star Wars to me.

First of all, you don't know whether Jotunheim is made purely of ice or is simply covered in ice.

Because if it's simply covered in ice, I'm pretty sure soil is easier to destroy than solid ice.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Perhaps I didn't. Where is that scene?

Towards the end of Avengers:AoU. When Tony is going over on how to destroy the city. Listen to what he says.

Originally posted by FrothByte
First of all, you don't know whether Jotunheim is made purely of ice or is simply covered in ice.

Because if it's simply covered in ice, I'm pretty sure soil is easier to destroy than solid ice.

The point was made that the Bifrost has the ability to destroy a world if used in such a manner. Don't fall for Josh's silly games.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrz-NL6MOyw

The planet seems made of Ice. I personally agree though, the core or mantle of the planet would likely be made of rock, however the surface is clearly Ice.

Furthermore, we only see the surface's distruction caused by the bifrost, so whether the core/mantle or lower layers were also afected remains unknown.

OMG, the Earth looks to be made of ice.

https://expeditions365.com/south-pole-expeditions/

Originally posted by Robtard
The point was made that the Bifrost has the ability to destroy a world if used in such a manner. Don't fall for Josh's silly games.

The movie said it would destroy Jutonheim, not any world. Perhaps you investigate should the meaning of a no-limit fallacy.

Originally posted by Silent Master
OMG, the Earth looks to be made of ice.

https://expeditions365.com/south-pole-expeditions/

OMG, you don't know what the poles are!!! 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
OMG, you don't know what the poles are!!! 😂

Irony overload.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Irony overload.

........................okay......................................

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The movie said it would destroy Jutonheim, not any world. Perhaps you investigate should the meaning of a no-limit fallacy.

Heimdall said leaving the Bifrost open would unleash its full power and destroy Jotenheim, because that was the world they (Thor and crew) were currently going to. Not that the Bifrost can only destroy Jotenheim if used at full power. #logic

Originally posted by Robtard
Heimdall said leaving the Bifrost open would unleash its full power and destroy Jotenheim, because that was the world they (Thor and crew) were currently going to. Not that the Bifrost can only destroy Jotenheim if used at full power. #logic

No limit fallacy on google or yahoo, as you please.