Naga Sadow vs. Exar Kun

Started by victreebelvictr2 pages
victreebelvictr Flowey's Only Friend

Originally posted by MythLord
Good for Vodo; he's probably better than Marka and Tulak, then.
I'm sure he could defeat an army of 10,000s if he had an army of his own, like Hord had. He also didn't need a ritual to become a Force Ghost, he needed a ritual to survive the Wall of Light cast by the entire Jedi Order.
You obviously don't remember what Khem Val said," He could take on armies of tens of thousands using only the blade."
notice that they said he, not he and army, just he. Meaning that he could do that by himself.

MythLord Diamond

You mean the same Khem Val that participated in those armies? It's not like Khem is a reliable source; he thinks Darth Nox is a reliable replacement for Tulak Hord, so Nox can now defeat tens of thousands by themselves? The same Nox that got headaches just by being in the same room as an artifact of Exar Kun's?

So Kun > Nox ~ Tulak, according to you.

victreebelvictr Flowey's Only Friend

Originally posted by MythLord
You mean the same Khem Val that participated in those armies? It's not like Khem is a reliable source; he thinks Darth Nox is a reliable replacement for Tulak Hord, so Nox can now defeat tens of thousands by themselves? The same Nox that got headaches just by being in the same room as an artifact of Exar Kun's?

So Kun > Nox ~ Tulak, according to you.


1. No, I mean the ones that weren’t recorded as important.
2. Val is the closest we have to Tulak as a source, so unless Tulak finally got a novel, that is the best we have other than scrolls and ancient texts.
3. You said Nox is a “reliable” replacement. In which he is, that doesn’t mean he can defeat Tulak himself, it simply means that he was the best to replace Tulak at the time.

MythLord Diamond

1. If they weren't recorded, then how do we know it's legit?
2. And that being true, it's still invalid to assume everything he says is factual.
3. Khem obviously believes Nox is at least comparable to Tulak, so the comparison still stands.

victreebelvictr Flowey's Only Friend

Originally posted by MythLord
1. If they weren't recorded, then how do we know it's legit?
2. And that being true, it's still invalid to assume everything he says is factual.
3. Khem obviously believes Nox is at least comparable to Tulak, so the comparison still stands.

1. It is known that about two battles were truly important that were named, though, it also mentions that he fought in hundreds of battles meaning they are legitimate, just not known for their name.
2. That is true, but at least we have someone who was a direct source from him. Why would he lie about the master he loved ever so much. Would he try to make him sound more powerful than he is, maybe. But he states that Tulak is an extremely dangerous opponent which we are sure about. I estimate that about 88% of what he says is true at the LEAST.
3. Compares to him, but not as powerful. Tulak recorded that Lord Kallig was his most powerful rival. Though, we all know that Tulak could beat him, Same with Nox.