Ajunta Pall vs. Karness Muur

Started by victreebelvictr1 pagesPoll

Ajunta Pall vs. Karness Muur

Ajunta Pall vs. Karness Muur

Let’s see how battle of the day #1 goes.

Ajunta Pall would be able to defeat Karness Muur. Pall was better than Muur when it came to dueling. Muur focused on force power while Pall was more skilled in dueling. Muur was proficient at using a lightsaber, but Pall was even more proficient at using his blade. Also, many Sith were out to get Pall’s blade after his death. It was stated to be more powerful in the dark side, which we can predict that it may have given the user an upper hand somehow. Muur was probably a more powerful force user though. He was able to whip up force storms even after his death, which a slightly doubt that Pall can do. Muur’s amulet wouldn’t be much of a help in the battle with Pall because it controlled leviathans, and Muur couldn’t just make one so fast or Pall would slice him. Pall also had powerful skills in the force, so he can at least fend off lots of Muur’s attacks.

Muur was Pall's shadow hand, which sounds pretty self-explanatory.

True, but their may always be the chance that Muur surpassed him at one point.

Murr* has better feats on paper.

Stomping Krayt is a big deal.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Murr* has better feats on paper.

Stomping Krayt is a big deal.

I wouldn't call it a full on stomp for the fact that Krayt was weak due to the seeds and near the end of his life during the battle.

Pall was the leader of the Exiles, and the leader of the Dark Jedi when they lost the Battle of Corbos. The Book of Sith states that he personally killed the reigning Sith king and took his place. He was the strongest Dark sider at that time, or else the others wouldn't submit to him.

Did one or more of his compatriots eventually surpass him? We just don't know. But we know that Muur, Dreypa, Xoxaan and Sorzus Syn became stronger and acquired many abilities by melding their knowledge with all the ancient Sith lore available at that time. It would make zero sense for Pall to be the exception.

Originally posted by Unbowed
Pall was the leader of the Exiles, and the leader of the Dark Jedi when they lost the Battle of Corbos. The Book of Sith states that he personally killed the reigning Sith king and took his place. He was the strongest Dark sider at that time, or else the others wouldn't submit to him.

Did one or more of his compatriots eventually surpass him? We just don't know. But we know that Muur, Dreypa, Xoxaan and Sorzus Syn became stronger and acquired many abilities by melding their knowledge with all the ancient Sith lore available at that time. It would make zero sense for Pall to be the exception.

Are you ignoring the fact that he could have gotten stronger too? He didn’t just sit there I assure you.

I don't think Ajunta got any stronger, no.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
I don't think Ajunta got any stronger, no.
and if he did, it's not stated in any sources.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
and if he did, it's not stated in any sources.
Are you thinking that Pall did nothing for training? I doubt that. He was smarter than that.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Murr* has better feats on paper.

It's Muur.

Originally posted by Trocity
It's Muur.
Even if someone has more feats, doesn’t make them stronger. Tulak Hord had few feats, but we all know how strong he was.

Pall enthralled the entire Sith species on Korriban, so he's hardly lacking feats himself.