This whole thing seems really "convenient". I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories but for the love of Muhammad this whole thing seems suspect.
I mean it's not hard to see Surturs doing something like this, on the other hand.
I don't know, maybe it'd seem more legit if someone got blown up and the guy wasn't instantly caught. srug
Seeming suspicious without proof is just being paranoid. With this current political free for all it brings the nuts out. All over fb you see the divide is real.
With sending all these packages and the fbi working with the post office this dude was going to get nailed quickly. This guy seemed like an epic failure to boot.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
This whole thing seems really "convenient". I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories but for the love of Muhammad this whole thing seems suspect.I mean it's not hard to see Surturs doing something like this, on the other hand.
I don't know, maybe it'd seem more legit if someone got blown up and the guy wasn't instantly caught. srug
Occam's razor.
Originally posted by One Big MobI've never really understood this mentality. I mean sure, if there is some sort of inconsistency in the narrative I could understand scrutiny, but "it's convenient" is not suspicious behavior.
This whole thing seems really "convenient". I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories but for the love of Muhammad this whole thing seems suspect.I mean it's not hard to see Surturs doing something like this, on the other hand.
I don't know, maybe it'd seem more legit if someone got blown up and the guy wasn't instantly caught. srug
I mean, if I'm competing with a coworker for a promotion, and the guy goes to jail for drunk driving the day before the interview, his misfortune is absolutely my gain in the scenario but no one would suspect me of setting him up as a result.
Also, Timothy McVeigh was caught like three days after his bombing.
Originally posted by TzeentchBecause there's a bunch of pics of unexploded bombs outside of packages and quite a few of them actually got sent. And nothing went kablammo out of like 14 bombs.
I've never really understood this mentality. I mean sure, if there is some sort of inconsistency in the narrative I could understand scrutiny, but "it's convenient" is not suspicious behavior.I mean, if I'm competing with a coworker for a promotion, and the guy goes to jail for drunk driving the day before the interview, his misfortune is absolutely my gain in the scenario but no one would suspect me of setting him up as a result.
Also, Timothy McVeigh was caught like three days after his bombing.
"I never understood this mentality"
Yes, because I go around defending Trump and make conspiracy theory posts all the time. I don't give a shit about that, it's just that this one turned out a little too "gg2ez" for my tastes.
Maybe mail bombs just aren't the way to go for Surtur though? I think he's going to have to place it and set the whole thing homself next time.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Suspicious packages sent to Clintons, Obamas, CNN
Originally posted by dadudemon
You mean the former Airforce turned Intelligence Operative who worked for Pluribus International Corporation who get arrested and found guilty for sending classified information to the new agency?The lady who didn't work the the FBI? That lady?
Yes, I've heard of her.
This is strike 1. If you make it to strike 3, you'll be demoted to the list of idiots I ignore because you're too stupid for me to spend any time interacting with. Let's hope you don't make it to strike 3 on my idiot-assessment scale. I don't have high-hopes.
Not neccesarily if you can have a person like that in one intelligence agency you can have them in another
Originally posted by dadudemon
Sorry, you can't use "etc etc" to imply things you don't know about. If you want to make a point, you should be specific instead of being lazy with an "etc."
Sure I can use etc I was under the assumption that you were knowledgeable and would know about this stuff, but it looks like I was wrong.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Since Obama is out of office and you have used a present tense "has been doing" phrase, this implies Obama is currently doing things with the Justice Department that you find bad.
What I was refering to is ths stuff he did during his 8 years as President and what he is currently doing now.
https://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/
He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.
He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.
Originally posted by dadudemon
The only thing that really comes to mind is Holder, the Obama-appointed Attorney General, and his clearly corrupt "too big to fail so too big to prosecute" banks for the Great Recession.But, clearly, you are using present tense phrasing so Obama must be doing some just terrible these days of which I am not aware.
Please, do, educate me on your "etc etc" because I am apparently living under a rock.
Really? Is that it? Are you a Conservative? I hope not. So you don't know about Eric Holder trying to damage the second amendment and The Fast and Furious scandal? You don't know about Obama using the IRS to presecute Christians and Conservatives? You don't know about Obama persecuting whistle blowers in intelligence agencies and journalists?
Yeah you do live under a rock.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Apparently not. Apparently I know much more about Reality Winner than you do.
And it looks like I know more about American politics than you do.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You mean the unproven cover-up that the GOP would CLEARLY be all over if it had substance?
Ok you clearly don't know what you're talking about and this is a very silly statement. Next thing you will do is start telling me that there are no corrupt republicans. The FBI has been creating fake terror plots and setting up indivduals for YEARS. The GOP have never been over it, why would they now?
Originally posted by dadudemonhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-fbi-wipe-phones-of-las-vegas-eyewitnesses/
While I do believe there is a conspiracy involved, it is not a partisan FBI conspiracy since the FBI leans conservative. At best, from what we know at the moment, the only leads persued were ones that lead investigators thought had the greatest value and merit. Any leads abandoned do not necessarily indicate some sort of conspiracy.
If the FBI has been confiscating phones and deleting evidence...where are all of these people? There'd be hundreds of them. It would be impossible to keep them quiet.
I'll give you this point: I do see fishy things happening around this event and there is clearly a cover-up at play. The details, though, I don't know and none of us can know.
And, yes, I am aware of this write-up:
It can certainly be a leftist conspiracy because Obama was President for 8 years and is still behind the scenes trying to sabotage things.
Originally posted by dadudemonJames Comey, Republican conservative James Comey who worked for the FBI who has had an antagonistic relationship with Trump because Trump is a narcissistic moron? Now what was I saying about FBI having a lot of conservatives in it...
I would rather live in fantasy land than Idiot-Valley, where you are.
Ok this really shows you that you don't know anything about American politics. Just because somebody says that they're Republican doesn't mean they're Conservative and want to follow Republican policies. What you have is lefties pretending to be Conservative and Republican to give the illusion that they're trying to help Conservatives when they're really betraying them. For example James Comey let Hillary Clinton go free when she should be in jail.
James Comey went live on televison listed out her crimes, people thought that she might actually go to jail and then gave her a pass. He even went further to say that if anybody else did the samething they would go to jail. James Comey went live on television but for some strange reason you seemed to have missed it. Apparently you work with the FBI and nobodies told you he's a disgrace?
Oh and I hate break this to you but becoming a self made billionaire and becoming The President of America makes you the opposite of a moron. Yes I know he inherited a million. There are a lot of millions in a billion.
Originally posted by dadudemon
There are. The most common profile of a terrorist in the US, based on facts not your Idiot-Valley feelings, is a white male, Christian and/or Right-Wing, between 20-45.Deal with reality. 😐
Not sure if you're serious. Anyway I'm not going to waste my time arguing for 100 pages make an intelligent response or I'm going to ignore you.