Suspicious packages sent to Clintons, Obamas, CNN

Started by Surtur23 pages
Originally posted by RealistRacism
I'm sorry but why do we care if someone like Soros or Clinton gets their just deserts? It's not like these packages contain anything anyway.

I don't wish them any harm. I wish the Clintons would step back and just retire. And whatever the hell George Soros gets up to...I'd prefer he just retire as well the dude is super old. Just bang hookers and do coke until you die, that is what a normal person would do if they were rich and old.

Anyways, as to the topic, it's good they got to these things in time. Rob you might not have heard that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is involved, or at least one of her offices.

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't wish them any harm. I wish the Clintons would step back and just retire. And whatever the hell George Soros gets up to...I'd prefer he just retire as well the dude is super old. Just bang hookers and do coke until you die, that is what a normal person would do if they were rich and old.
IOW: It's the victims fault, because they just won't step back/retire.

Good lord.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: It's the victims fault, because they just won't step back/retire.

Good lord.

So you're trolling now, okay. I did not say anything like what you just described lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
Anyways, as to the topic, it's good they got to these things in time. Rob you might not have heard that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is involved, or at least one of her offices.

So yet another potential act of terrorism from these people. Lovely.

Originally posted by Robtard
So yet another potential act of terrorism from these people. Lovely.

The return address goes back to one of her offices. But it doesn't mean it is her.

Return Address Found On Suspicious Packages Belongs To Well-Known Democrat

This is getting weird.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you're trolling now, okay. I did not say anything like what you just described lol.

You explicitly implied it, that this is their fault for not "stepping back" and "retiring", that by not doing so they called this onto themselves. Go read your post.

Small correction: a package was meant for Eric Holder but it was found in DWS office. So she wasn't the target.

Rob, why not wait until evidence came out as to whether these packages contained anything lethal? Pretty poor work here.

Originally posted by Robtard
You explicitly implied it, that this is their fault for not "stepping back" and "retiring", that by not doing so they called this onto themselves. Go read your post.

Lol I did nothing of the sort. I said I wish them no harm. Then I said I wish they would retire. So what? That doesn't mean I blame them.

I want you to pinky swear one thing: you will not use your army of strawmen for evil.

Originally posted by Surtur
The return address goes back to one of her offices. But it doesn't mean it is her.

Return Address Found On Suspicious Packages Belongs To Well-Known Democrat

This is getting weird.

Faking a return address is probably not hard.

I wonder what type/group of people would lazily want to make Wasserman Schultz look guilty...

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I did nothing of the sort. I said I wish them no harm. Then I said I wish they would retire. So what? That doesn't mean I blame them.

I want you to pinky swear one thing: you will not use your army of strawmen for evil.

You absolutely did imply it, it's clear; here's your post:

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't wish them any harm. I wish the Clintons would step back and just retire. And whatever the hell George Soros gets up to...I'd prefer he just retire as well the dude is super old. Just bang hookers and do coke until you die, that is what a normal person would do if they were rich and old.
Originally posted by Robtard
You absolutely did imply it, it's clear; here's your post:

Saying I wish they would retire doesn't mean I am blaming them lol. This trolling is getting old.

Originally posted by Surtur
Saying I wish they would retire doesn't mean I am blaming them lol. This trolling is getting old.

Saying you wish no harm on people but blaming them for the harm that happened are not exclusive; it can be both. Your antics are known.

edit: This isn't the first time you've wanted harm to happen to Clinton. Can't say so in regards to Obama though; if you did, I missed it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Saying you wish no harm on people but blaming them for the harm that happened are not exclusive; it can be both. Your antics are known.

edit: This isn't the first time you've wanted harm to happen to Clinton. Can't say so in regards to Obama though; if you did, I missed it.

Lol you're failing. Troll better.

The expected safety response. Get out of my thread. Thanks.

Yeah Surt was just saying he didn't wish violence on them, even if he thinks they're pieces of shit that should retire.

Not a hard thing to understand.

Originally posted by Robtard
The expected safety response. Get out of my thread. Thanks.

Lol, you're just a troll. And you can't even do it well. And if for some reason you aren't trolling you have legit mental issues so seek help.

I think maybe I'll post some more funny Antifa videos in here. After all..you decided to troll and lie about another poster, so why not?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yeah Surt was just saying he didn't wish violence on them, even if he thinks they're pieces of shit that should retire.

Not a hard thing to understand.

Bingo, he acts like he wants this to be a serious thread, but just acts like a troll.

🙄