Seems the Trumper fake news machine tried to push that the MAGA-Bomber was a registered Democrat after the "false flag" attempts failed:
Nothing to see here folks. kek
Originally posted by RobtardThe Incels at it again.
Seems the Trumper fake news machine tried to push that the MAGA-Bomber was a registered Democrat after the "false flag" attempts failed:Nothing to see here folks. kek
Originally posted by Robtard
Seems the Trumper fake news machine tried to push that the MAGA-Bomber was a registered Democrat after the "false flag" attempts failed:Nothing to see here folks. kek
Originally posted by Robtard
Seems the Trumper fake news machine tried to push that the MAGA-Bomber was a registered Democrat after the "false flag" attempts failed:Nothing to see here folks. kek
Hmmm, this feeds the conspiracy even further, imo.
"We don't know what it said before his arrest, but we have a ton of audit records for edits after his arrest." That's suspiciously convenient. Why do they have records for days after his arrest but magically no records from before? Hmm? Wayback machine may reveal something...let's see...
And he's a registered Republican? And they can't find any records of his party affiliation before 2016? Also conveniently fishy.
Even Snopes says party affiliation is not indicative of someone's true party affiliation/beliefs. Some register for the opposing party so they can vote in the primaries (lots of atheists I know do this in Oklahoma because they don't want a theocracy and Oklahoma gets close).
I'd like to ask people that were close to him. He seems like a curated patsy still, to me. I won't decide for sure until the FBI or court case tells us what is up.
I hope there is a red-wave as a backlash against the Dems. I hope that the Dems lose power and actually disappear as a party.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Hmmm, this feeds the conspiracy even further, imo."We don't know what it said before his arrest, but we have a ton of audit records for edits after his arrest." That's suspiciously convenient. Why do they have records for days after his arrest but magically no records from before? Hmm? Wayback machine may reveal something...let's see...
And he's a registered Republican? And they can't find any records of his party affiliation before 2016? Also conveniently fishy.
Even Snopes says party affiliation is not indicative of someone's true party affiliation/beliefs. Some register for the opposing party so they can vote in the primaries (lots of atheists I know do this in Oklahoma because they don't want a theocracy and Oklahoma gets close).
I'd like to ask people that were close to him. He seems like a curated patsy still, to me. I won't decide for sure until the FBI or court case tells us what is up.
I hope there is a red-wave as a backlash against the Dems. I hope that the Dems lose power and actually disappear as a party.
I think you’ve lost it, DDM
Originally posted by dadudemonDDM don't take the red pill...
Hmmm, this feeds the conspiracy even further, imo."We don't know what it said before his arrest, but we have a ton of audit records for edits after his arrest." That's suspiciously convenient. Why do they have records for days after his arrest but magically no records from before? Hmm? Wayback machine may reveal something...let's see...
And he's a registered Republican? And they can't find any records of his party affiliation before 2016? Also conveniently fishy.
Even Snopes says party affiliation is not indicative of someone's true party affiliation/beliefs. Some register for the opposing party so they can vote in the primaries (lots of atheists I know do this in Oklahoma because they don't want a theocracy and Oklahoma gets close).
I'd like to ask people that were close to him. He seems like a curated patsy still, to me. I won't decide for sure until the FBI or court case tells us what is up.
I hope there is a red-wave as a backlash against the Dems. I hope that the Dems lose power and actually disappear as a party.