Are all Trumpers "manbabies"?

Started by Putinbot12 pages

Are all Trumpers "manbabies"?

My observation is that they are on this board.

Can't really say all of them are manbabies based solely in those on this forum. Close the thread for faulty logic please.

Originally posted by Bentley
Can't really say all of them are manbabies based solely in those on this forum. Close the thread for faulty logic please.
or expand and extrapolate, state that yes they maybe/may not be but these are outliers you have examples where they are or aren't. That also works.

Odds are there are some who are not. But I’ve yet to meet one.

Using KMC as a micro-example, look how Trumpers are reacting towards last night’s election. Instead of taking a step back and using their huge losses in the House as a learning experience of “what did we do correct here; what did we do wrong?”, it’s sour grapes and they’re doubling down on their Trumper nonsense.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
or expand and extrapolate, state that yes they maybe/may not be but these are outliers you have examples where they are or aren't. That also works.

Why waste good scientific methods in proving whether peeps are manbabies? Is there a scientist around here that needs to eat so badly but finds no real job?

Originally posted by Bentley
Why waste good scientific methods in proving whether peeps are manbabies? Is there a scientist around here that needs to eat so badly but finds no real job?
why not use scientific, and or social science, opinion, allegorical evidence etc. Is it more or less important to discuss than any other issue on this page? And what criteria would you use to decide importance? People get grants to discuss equally banal discussion points.

@Rob exactly the point of the thread mate. Well put!

No, probably the extreme majority are not manbabies. But that very much depends on exactly how you define manbaby.

Originally posted by Robtard
Odds are there are some who are not. But I’ve yet to meet one.

Using KMC as a micro-example, look how Trumpers are reacting towards last night’s election. Instead of taking a step back and using their huge losses in the House as a learning experience of “what did we do correct here; what did we do wrong?”, it’s sour grapes and they’re doubling down on their Trumper nonsense.

Irony overload...

IOW: You don't have a proper counter to my post as usual

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: You don't have a proper counter to my post as usual

My counter is that the things you say are utterly hilarious given your posting history.

You also whine and call correctly pointing out Dems will obstruct "sour grapes" lol. Do better.

Your overall pissyness was sour grapes, yes. You're taking the Party of Trump losing the House very poorly as expected.

Not all but the ones I have noticed are as follows

Surtur, Fly, PSmith, darthgoober and Kevdude

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not all but the ones I have noticed are as follows

Surtur, Fly, PSmith, darthgoober and Kevdude


I'm not a Trumper, I didn't even vote and have no intention of voting next time either. If someone had held a gun to my head and made me choose between him and Hilary I would have voted for him, but I don't really believe in trying to chose between the lesser of two evils. I have no problem criticizing Republicans when they act loudly stupid or hypocritical, it's just that Dems seem to worse about it nowadays(especially in regards to hypocrisy).

Originally posted by darthgoober
I'm not a Trumper, I didn't even vote and have no intention of voting next time either. If someone had held a gun to my head and made me choose between him and Hilary I would have voted for him, but I don't really believe in trying to chose between the lesser of two evils. I have no problem criticizing Republicans when they act loudly stupid or hypocritical, it's just that Dems seem to worse about it nowadays(especially in regards to hypocrisy).
You embody the traits regardless of your faux intentions.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You embody the traits regardless of your faux intentions.
'
Hey I disagree, but I understand that you like to lump people into your preferred categories and ignore the nuance of any particular situation so feel free. Ironically it's a trait you share with Trump lol

Originally posted by darthgoober
'
Hey I disagree, but I understand that you like to lump people into your prefered categories and ignore the nuance of any particular situation so feel free.
I have known you for years so this is not something I decided on a whim.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have known you for years so this is not something I decided on a whim.

Ditto lol

Originally posted by darthgoober
Ditto lol
K.

Originally posted by quanchi112
K.

👆