Why I believe the Left will eventually win

Started by Robtard10 pages
Originally posted by dadudemon
Worse. He pays women to stay quiet so he can get elected while running under the banner of the Pro-Family political party.

True, but the Pro-Family political party/people knew Trump was a complete and shameless sleaze as a husband before November 2016, they just didn't care; they gave him a pass.

One of the reasons I look forward to Trump's defeat in 2020 is to see all the Family Values politicians, prominent figures and people once again claim to care about family values. Going to be great. eg "Newsom's not fit to be President, he's a shameless adulterer!"

Originally posted by Robtard
True, but the Pro-Family political party/people knew Trump was a complete and shameless sleaze as a husband before November 2016, they just didn't care; they gave him a pass.

One of the reasons I look forward to Trump's defeat in 2020 is to see all the Family Values politicians, prominent figures and people once again claim to care about family values. Going to be great. eg "Newsom's not fit to be President, he's a shameless adulterer!"

Yeah, I REALLY think paying her to stay quiet was the bigger mistake.

His reaction should have been:

"So what, who cares except for people obsessed with my penis?"

Instead of whatever this mess is, now.

*The mess seems to be that campaign funds might have been used to pay off Stormy.

I don't really follow the story too much though, I just like it when Avenatti talks shit and Trump like the idiot he is takes the bait and responds in some Twitter rant.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When LoB finds out my favorite prostitute is his mother he is so gonna freak.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
This may explain his aversion to the world's oldest sin. Mom's been setting a bad example that his priest of a father beats him for.

THEY MADE THIS FILM BASED ON MY LIFE WITH THE WOMEN IN YOUR FAMILIES!!!

whoa you're black?

hope you don't mind me saying, but i never would have guessed

LoB was raging about how much he despises Stan Lee earlier before he was shut down. LoB does not have a clear vision of the world.

Originally posted by quanchi112
LoB was raging about how much he despises Stan Lee earlier before he was shut down. LoB does not have a clear vision of the world.

TRANSLATION

I pointed out the fact that Stan Lee who enjoyed wealth and celebrity for the vast majority of his life is perceived by most to be the SOLE creator of The Marvel Universe. Conversely, Jack Kirby who by ALL reasonable accounts at least co-created The Marvel Universe with Lee died in relative anonymity and financial struggle. All the while Lee never utilized his gravitas with Marvel and the public to help him or his heirs.

That is equal to hate to the dimwitted Thanosi known as Quan.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[b]TRANSLATION

I pointed out the fact that Stan Lee who enjoyed wealth and celebrity for the vast majority of his life is perceived by most to be the SOLE creator of The Marvel Universe. Conversely, Jack Kirby who by ALL reasonable accounts at least co-created The Marvel Universe with Lee died in relative anonymity and financial struggle. All the while Lee never utilized his gravitas with Marvel and the public to help him or his heirs.

That is equal to hate to the dimwitted Thanosi known as Quan. [/B]

That is your opinion it is not proven. In life men walk on their own and Kirby lived his own life. Just because Stan Lee was more successful does not mean he can Surt Kirby through life. Regardless of your belly aching you picked the time right after Lees death to ballyhoo over it. You are a dim witted man who probably heard this somewhere and just let it dictate your tiny brain without looking at any other perspective.

Stan Lee died a king. Long live the MCU under the Disney banner.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[b]TRANSLATION

I pointed out the fact that Stan Lee who enjoyed wealth and celebrity for the vast majority of his life is perceived by most to be the SOLE creator of The Marvel Universe. Conversely, Jack Kirby who by ALL reasonable accounts at least co-created The Marvel Universe with Lee died in relative anonymity and financial struggle. All the while Lee never utilized his gravitas with Marvel and the public to help him or his heirs.

That is equal to hate to the dimwitted Thanosi known as Quan. [/B]

LoB, we have no issues with each other.

But may I make a suggestion that will help with this whole situation?

Smoke some weeeeeeeeeeed, man!

Play some video games. You let these yahoos get under your skin too easily. Don't let them win by reacting with high-negative emotions like this.

Do you see my signature? I had a very very long day at work, had to skip my lunch, and then had to clean up a financial mess made by someone else at work after I had left for work. Know what I did? I got some New York Style Cheesecake, got some Cherry Pie Filling, and ate myself a slice of cheesecake JUST like you see in my sig. Helped me forget about all the stress. Pulled up the news, played some video games, etc.

It was great!

Obviously,I can't do this everyday or I would end up super fat. But I destressed. And it was awesome.

Try it. If you are okay with it, smoke weed.

I have never smoked weed.

LoB needs a hooker his parents pay for.

Originally posted by BackFire
I have never smoked weed.

Neither have I. It's just not appealing. I'll try THC desserts one day.

It's legal here, there's a legal pot store not far from my gf's place, could try it sometime. Too lazy, don't need to be made more lazy.

get some indica

Originally posted by quanchi112
That is your opinion it is not proven. In life men walk on their own and Kirby lived his own life. Just because Stan Lee was more successful does not mean he can Surt Kirby through life. Regardless of your belly aching you picked the time right after Lees death to ballyhoo over it. You are a dim witted man who probably heard this somewhere and just let it dictate your tiny brain without looking at any other perspective.

Stan Lee died a king. Long live the MCU under the Disney banner.

READ THIS IMBECILE AND THEN SHUT YOUR FOOL MOUTH!!

Originally posted by dadudemon
LoB, we have no issues with each other.

But may I make a suggestion that will help with this whole situation?

Smoke some weeeeeeeeeeed, man!

Play some video games. You let these yahoos get under your skin too easily. Don't let them win by reacting with high-negative emotions like this.

Do you see my signature? I had a very very long day at work, had to skip my lunch, and then had to clean up a financial mess made by someone else at work after I had left for work. Know what I did? I got some New York Style Cheesecake, got some Cherry Pie Filling, and ate myself a slice of cheesecake JUST like you see in my sig. Helped me forget about all the stress. Pulled up the news, played some video games, etc.

It was great!

Obviously,I can't do this everyday or I would end up super fat. But I destressed. And it was awesome.

Try it. If you are okay with it, smoke weed.

I don't use drugs though I WOULD go downtown to Juniors on your suggestion.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Rome, Babylon, and Persia for starters.

Since I'm so wrong describe the social climate of those nations before they fell.

I'll wait.

Rome existed as a state for almost 2000 years, and was irreversibly brought down by Christian Crusaders sacking Constantinople and shattering their empire to splinters, making them vulnerable to Turks gobbling up their Anatolian land. Sexual deviancy had absolutely nothing to do with this.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Rome existed as a state for almost 2000 years, and was irreversibly brought down by Christian Crusaders sacking Constantinople and shattering their empire to splinters, making them vulnerable to Turks gobbling up their Anatolian land. Sexual deviancy had absolutely nothing to do with this.

Why was Rome suddenly so weak to outside attacks when they surmounted them before?

Answer

Their decadent and debaucherous lifestyle left them vulnerable.

Rome was never "suddenly" weak to outside attacks, their collapse was a gradual process that occurred over centuries upon centuries, often shifting and changing like the tide. Even during the Late Roman period in the 5th century, the Roman army was still the example all of Europe looked upon to emulate, their problem was an economic one, as they could scarcely afford to pay all the soldiers and mercenaries they needed to maintain their borders. The only real major shift that marked a downward turn in their military was the Battle of Manzikert, where opportunistic backstabbers ruined what should have been an easily fought battle, allowing Muslims to seize great chunks of the pool of Roman manpower.

Rome gradually lost relevance overtime for a plethora of reasons, but if you want to point a finger at one as to the reason for their militaristic downturn, point one at greedy landholders buying up the estates, setting the scene for the coming feudal system, and refusing to pay their taxes to the Empire. Or point at their inability to incorporate Germanic immigrants into their Empire, both being unable to force them to submit to the authority of Rome, while relying on them to serve as soldiers, while paradoxically maintaining an air of xenophobia towards them, and not allowing them to assimilate into Roman culture.