Thor Odinson vs Supergirl (H2H)

Originally posted by abhilegend
Leave Carter to omit the fact that Superman was weakened by kryptonite radiation earlier.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MgeySs84BbQ/W8_FkQ8cXfI/AAAAAAAARGs/0KkoxfYIPCUS7XZjxecUyS1eyLr3r1FewCHMYCw/s1600/RCO003.jpg

Then there is this.

The planet explodes in the middle of the sentence and not even his hair is mussed.

It literally feels like one of those movie scenes where a place is about to blow up then it does... Short pause.... They kind of make u feel like the the hero(s) didn't make it, but then the camera pans to a specific spot, they appear to have made it out at the last second.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I actually think that's a speed/reaction feat.

It literally feels like one of those movie scenes where a place is about to blow up then it does... Short pause.... They kind of make u feel like the the hero(s) didn't make it, but then they appear to have made it out the last second.

This is also written by James Robinson who already showed kryptonians can tank planet busting explosions.

There's also no indication he tanked it because we don't see him at all enduring the explosion.

Ure opinion is fine. I just think it's a different feat.

Originally posted by carver9
Why would I point that out when the machine "mimicked" Kryptonite and it was meant to hurt him, not weaken him. I see no need in mentioning that.

That's what kryptonite does to Superman carter, it hurts and weakens him.

The scene you posted is highly debatable. The day Galan posted those scans people debated against it. He was long gone before that blast touched him. I know your opinion differs but whatever. I've learned a long time ago there is no changing your mind, no matter what is presented, but, again, the blast didn't touch him.

And what proof do you have that unanimously proves that he was gone before the planet explodes?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I actually think that's a speed/reaction feat.

It literally feels like one of those movie scenes where a place is about to blow up then it does... Short pause.... They kind of make u feel like the the hero(s) didn't make it, but then the camera pans to a specific spot, they appear to have made it out at the last second.

👆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
There's also no indication he tanked it because we don't see him at all enduring the explosion.

Because it's a zoomed out page, you don't see him leave the planet either.

Ure opinion is fine. I just think it's a different feat.

Well your opinion ignores the comic and the very point of Superman returning to the planet when he knew it was going to explode.

And your opinion is just wrong as usual.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
They heal from it or their necks just won't snap?

Nice 👆

Originally posted by abhilegend

And what proof do you have that unanimously proves that he was gone before the planet explodes?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Lol that's why i never stated it as fact... Same reason why u can't really claim he stood there and ate the explosion. All fine to me.

Don't act like its ambiguous to what happened, it's just your usual propaganda.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes, as a matter of fact I can say he just stood there and took the blast. Because it was in the middle of the sentence and he wasn't going to just leave the planet in the middle of the conversation.

Don't act like its ambiguous to what happened, it's just your usual propaganda.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
That doesn't prove anything. It's still an opinion. Waiting for a planet to explode on your face knowing that u have the ability to avoid that kind is situation actually follows sound logic to be honest.
Again just my opinion

You can't accept it? No shit, you don't accept anything from Superman unless its written in neon letters and sometimes not even then.

Superman tanked the explosion of the planet. Deal with it or prove otherwise. None of your mewling matters here.

It's not the matter of opinion here, you can't invalidate a feat with your opinion which is what you're trying to do. Post proof or shut up.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes, it does. In fact it explains everything in that comic.

You can't accept it? No shit, you don't accept anything from Superman unless its written in neon letters and sometimes not even then.

Superman tanked the explosion of the planet. Deal with it or prove otherwise. None of your mewling matters here.

It's not the matter of opinion here, you can't invalidate a feat with your opinion which is what you're trying to do. Post proof or shut up.

Sorry but u have an extensive history of misinterpreting scenes especially Superman ones Sooo.... Accepting your statements blindly would be bad on my part or anyone's for that matter.

I'd rather stick with the other opinion over yours. Just looks more plausible to me. Unless of course u can post proof.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17

Sorry but u have an extensive history of misinterpreting scenes especially Superman ones Sooo.... Accepting your statements blindly would be bad on my part or anyone's for that matter.

👆

So true.

Originally posted by carver9
👆

So true.

lol this is ironic, coming from you. 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Lol.. U get triggered at the drop of a dime.

And you get triggered by literally anything done by Superman.

Sorry but u have an extensive history of misinterpreting scenes especially Superman ones Sooo.... Accepting your statements blindly would be bad on my part or anyone's for that matter.

And you have an extensive history of lowballing Superman, so bad on my part or anyone to accept your opinion at all.

I'd rather stick with the other opinion over yours. Just looks more plausible to me. Unless of course u can post proof.

Nobody is out to convince you. Keep your opinion to yourself unless you have any proof.

You're not the judge whose authority validate a feat.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Lol.. U get triggered at the drop of a dime.

Sorry but u have an extensive history of misinterpreting scenes especially Superman ones Sooo.... Accepting your statements blindly would be bad on my part or anyone's for that matter.

I'd rather stick with the other opinion over yours. Just looks more plausible to me. Unless of course u can post proof.

Originally posted by abhilegend
But in all these scenarios, the nuke or flame thrower do more than what you informed.

When Ego blasted outwards, only the nearby planetoids were destroyed and the rest of the planetoids were intact.

From Thor 161.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xTLvBYE5pnE/VnpeVNVXeVI/AAAAAAAAPr4/xA6zm40mzg0/s1600-Ic42/RCO002.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h2V5opGC7bI/VnpeVFdk8_I/AAAAAAAAPr4/Z4vBxYTjbcs/s1600-Ic42/RCO003.jpg

So Ego may have power to do more than that, but the blast which koed Thor was only powerful enough to destroy nearby planetoids and no amount of "No limit fallacy" is going to change that.

This is again irony at its best, you proved me wrong by "speculating" that Ego may have used more power than destroy planetoids by applying false analogies and not showing a single proof. I however have shown that he only used power enough to destroy planetoids and other celestial objects were intact but I'm the one wrong here?

Thorbags, never change.

Congrats, you've shown its easier to ko someone when surprised. Now show us that after passing out someone is easier to kill.

Wait, Zod should have easily killed Diana and Clark because they were both koed, right?

There's a lot of things you are incapable of comprehending it seems.

Not if there's nothing within range, the power is still limited. It's more than enough but if the other objects are outside of range...then it doesn't matter.

Why are you even arguing the point when it's far more than planetary already? That should go in the respect thread lol.

Yes, you are wrong. Sadly so. Oh, my observation is grounded on far more than yours. You think because all that was destroyed was planetoids, that is the absolute minimum amount of power that was used. Why on Earth would that be true?

A no limit fallacy isn't what you're saying it is, it's more applicable to things like "oh Jean Grey has never failed to mind control someone so I guess Eternity is up for grabs" (example). You're suggesting that Ego used precise energy in an explosion that destroyed multiple planetoids to not go over some invisible line you're placing on the attack.

Abhi, are you suggesting that it takes the same degree of difficulty to kill an unconscious Superman than it does to kill him alive and wriggling? That is absolutely ridiculous. The body is still, vulnerable. It's the same concept as getting caught by surprise except much worse.

Yes, Sundipped Zod should have been able to kill them easily. It's a comic book, Zod isn't going to just stomp on Superman's head and call it a day.

Yeah, yeah, Thorbag this, Thorbag that. This Throbag gave you your second place medal, don't forget that. If you want to play that game /shrug

Edit: Also lol at you not wanting to post your own evidence? Must've not been anything special.

Originally posted by Damborgson
Not if there's nothing within range, the power is still limited. It's more than enough but if the other objects are outside of range...then it doesn't matter.

So it didn't destroy anything else but it was still more powerful than destroying planetoids? Because? You said so?

Why are you even arguing the point when it's far more than planetary already? That should go in the respect thread lol.

How is it more than planetary?

Yes, you are wrong. Sadly so. Oh, my observation is grounded on far more than yours. You think because all that was destroyed was planetoids, that is the absolute minimum amount of power that was used. Why on Earth would that be true?

How are you aware that it was the absolute minimum of power used? Did Stan Lee wrote some secret issue for you?

Because only planetoids were destroyed. That's how.

A no limit fallacy isn't what you're saying it is, it's more applicable to things like "oh Jean Grey has never failed to mind control someone so I guess Eternity is up for grabs" (example). You're suggesting that Ego used precise energy in an explosion that destroyed multiple planetoids to not go over some invisible line you're placing on the attack.

No, what you're doing is textbook NLF.

Yes, that's exactly what's said and shown. No amount of wordplay is going to change it.

Abhi, are you suggesting that it takes the same degree of difficulty to kill an unconscious Superman than it does to kill him alive and wriggling? That is absolutely ridiculous. The body is still, vulnerable. It's the same concept as getting caught by surprise except much worse.

But you're suggesting that Thor was easier to kill when koed because you think so when it's never implied in the comic itself.

You're injecting your own views in the comic.

Yes, Sundipped Zod should have been able to kill them easily. It's a comic book, Zod isn't going to just stomp on Superman's head and call it a day.

So its a comic when it suits you and isn't when it doesn't suits you.

Talk about having your cake and eat it too.

Yeah, yeah, Thorbag this, Thorbag that. This Throbag gave you your second place medal, don't forget that. If you want to play that game /shrug

Yes, you also caused my fever I guess. Darn it.

Edit: Also lol at you not wanting to post your own evidence? Must've not been anything special.

WTF are you talking about now?

Originally posted by XLR87T3
The largest planetoid (aka asteroid) is called Ceres. It is about one-quarter the size of the moon, so Thor being nearly killed by it is still not impressive compared to other heralds. And average sized asteroids are country sized, comparable to being hit by Spain or Turkey, so even Byrne era Superman's strength is enough to nearly kill Thor