Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Damn. You're killing it lately, Parm.PM that scene to Stoic, I don't want him to able to sleep tonight 👆
Unlike many others, i dont have issues with being wrong Stilt, it just seems logical that characters that feed on life force shouldn't be able to feed on the dead. In my opinion the writer is an idiot, or the reason behind their ability to drain a vampire is because it was a totem.
Inheritors have also been shown to be able to drain non totems.
Morlun did it in his early showings with a black woman on the street before there were any other inheritors. But recently Verna was shown to drain a female astronaut and it was revealed that they not only gain their essence but also their knowledge which makes them even more op than they already were.
Also Brix and Bora were about to or at least bthink about draining an ordinary police officer who then ran away. Don't have the scan at hand atm.
EDIT: Vampires are totems by default, because Bats and shit.
Originally posted by Parmaniac
Inheritors have also been shown to be able to drain non totems.Morlun did it in his early showings with a black woman on the street before there were any other inheritors. But recently Verna was shown to drain a female astronaut and it was revealed that they not only gain their essence but also their knowledge which makes them even more op than they already were.
Also Brix and Bora were about to or at least bthink about draining an ordinary police officer who then ran away. Don't have the scan at hand atm.
EDIT: Vampires are totems by default, because Bats and shit.
I know all about what they can drain. I question whether or not they can drain a being that has a lack of life force in them. That vampire was also a Spider Totem. Dracula isn't, which isn't to say that they could not drain him, it just would not make sense to me, but that may just be my perspective. However, he did mention the irony of it after all, which was indicative of it being highly irregular from where i stand.
You may want to reread every post that i made on this subject. I never made or took a firm stance on anything other than stating that Dracula was subjectively the more powerful of the two. Just in case someone attempts to smash it in my face like Stilt attempted to.
Wait, vampires are totems now? Based on what? Any proof of this?
Originally posted by CosmicComet
He clearly mentioned irony because normally vampires are the ones thought of as draining life force.
And what concrete evidence proves that vampires, not bats, mice, wolves, rats, mist, or any other form that they can take are in fact mystical totems, and not the progeny of Vernae? I'm genuinely curious to understand the correlation.
