Why do so many alt-right kids here admire Hitler?

Originally posted by cdtm
He's trolling.

Bush Junior is responsible for destruction of Iraq under the pretext of dismantling its WMD programs. Much of the world cautioned Bush administration against this move, but it ignored such calls.

You talk about Holocaust. Please explain to me what happened in Abu Ghraib prison. FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

US won the war, but Iraq burned for 15 straight years; estimated 2.4 million people perished in Iraq since 2003. FYI: https://www.mintpressnews.com/iraq-and-beyond-how-many-millions-have-been-killed-in-american-wars/239468/

Neighboring Syria also experienced fallout of war in Iraq through the hands of ISIS movement whose founding fathers include former members of Saddam's Ba'ath party.

I understand that wars can be brutal, and armed forces cannot afford to be lenient in the battlefield. My point of contention is that Bush junior deserve a spot in the list of MAD MEN because he decided to victimize a sovereign country without solid justification. He is no different from Hitler in this respect.

Remember this! A person show his true colors when he is swimming in the pool of great power. MAD MEN are not defined by statistics but their mindset and decisions when in power.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Am I?

Bush Junior is responsible for destruction of Iraq under the pretext of dismantling its WMD programs. Much of the world cautioned Bush administration against this move, but it ignored such calls.

You talk about Holocaust. Please explain to me what happened in Abu Ghraib prison. FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

US won the war, but Iraq burned for 15 straight years; estimated 2.4 million people perished in Iraq since 2003. FYI: https://www.mintpressnews.com/iraq-and-beyond-how-many-millions-have-been-killed-in-american-wars/239468/

Neighboring Syria also experienced fallout of war in Iraq through the hands of ISIS movement whose founding fathers include former members of Saddam's Ba'ath party.

I understand that wars can be brutal, and armed forces cannot afford to be lenient in the battlefield. My point of contention is that Bush junior deserve a spot in the list of MAD MEN because he decided to victimize a sovereign country without solid justification. He is no different from Hitler in this respect.

Remember this! A person show his true colors when he is swimming in the pool of great power. MAD MEN are not defined by statistics but their mindset and decisions when in power.

Other than the fact that the NYTimes quietly broke the news that really did have WMDs (it was back in 2012 or 2014, I posted about it on KMC, before), everything in your post is great.

Bush was an atrocious murderer. Obama continued his murdering but expanded drone strike program. And Trump continued Obama's murdering.

I don't like the Dems or GOP. They are full of murderers.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You know who does not sputter, trying to defend themselves? People who know they are not racist.

"Are you a racist?"
"No"
"That's just what a racist would say!"
"When did I say anything racist?!"
"You criticized Islam!"
"Islam isn't a race!"
"It's made up of mostly brown people so clearly only that can be your motivation!"
"You're pulling that out of your ass you don't know my reasons for criticizing Islam, I don't think it promotes good values it has nothing to do with something as shallow as skin color"
"Oh yeah, um well, um, you don't like illegal immigration!"
"Yes I don't want people illegally crossing the border regardless of their color, that's why we have borders and laws and citizenship."
"RACIST!"
"How is that racist?"
"Because mexicans are brown!"
"That's not my reasoning!"
"I CAN READ YOUR MIND AND YOU'RE A RACIST"
"Stop reading motivations into me that you can't actually prove!"
"Oh you protest too much, therefore you must be a racist!"

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You know who does not sputter, trying to defend themselves? People who know they are not racist.

Because they either imply that there aren't consequences to how other people think about you, or imply that other people can't possibly believe something that isn't true.

Both of these assertions would be absolute and utter nonsense. The way the public perceives you has serious consequences, and it's entirely possible for people to be mislead into believing something that isn't true, otherwise propaganda would've never been a thing because people have this piercing vision that allows them to never view people or events incorrectly.

I mean shit you're a gay guy right? I imagine it wasn't that long ago that gay people might've been sputtering to defend themselves as not mentally ill. Or sputtering to defend themselves as not pedophiles. Right? People who would know that they aren't mentally ill and who know that they don't want to **** children, but who are terrified of people with a lot of influence convincing the public that they do want to **** kids or that they are mentally ill because that shit could absolutely destroy someone's life.

Also why don't you tell that shit to a woman in the Salem Witch trials.

WhY ArE yOU spUtTErInG tO DeFEnD yOuRSeLf If YoU AreNt a WiTCh!!!
Maybe its because some people are stupid and gullible enough to believe she is a witch and will ****ing execute her if they think she's a witch you ****ing moron.

And clearly you never read To Kill a Mocking Bird. "WHY WOULD THE BLACK GUY SPUTTER TO DEFEND HIMSELF IF HE KNOWS HE DIDN'T RAPE THE WHITE GIRL?!"
Oh jeez, maybe because people aren't these omniscient unbiased people who can just intuit that he didn't rape her and will instead assume he did to gratify their own biases?

So it's no ****ing wonder that someone would get seriously defensive about their own character when a ****ing TV anchor accuses them of being racist in front of millions of viewers who trust what they say and take them very seriously and are likely predisposed to assume the worst of the intentions of those who disagree with them politically.

The idea that a nonracist should have nothing to fear from being slandered in a wildly influential media outlet as a racist is absolute and utter nonsense.

People on the Left do not have to deal with the same "Consequences" as people on the Right do.

Yeah Adam knows it's people he disagrees with politically that'll always be on the receiving end of accusations of racism from progressives.

And that Kids is how "SOCIAL JUSTICE" Works!!!!!

Originally posted by Emperordmb
The way the public perceives you has serious consequences, and it's entirely possible for people to be mislead into believing something that isn't true, otherwise propaganda would've never been a thing because people have this piercing vision that allows them to never view people or events incorrectly.

Tell me more about how Russian interference did not influence the 2016 election.

Ohhh Adam just served himself up on a platter.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Tell me more about how Russian interference did not influence the 2016 election.

Now why don’t you actually address the point instead of proving that you actually disagree with your own logic in other circumstances when it happens to be favorable to you.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Tell me more about how Russian interference did not influence the 2016 election.

Haha

Originally posted by Emperordmb
So it's no ****ing wonder that someone would get seriously defensive about their own character when a ****ing TV anchor accuses them of being racist in front of millions of viewers who trust what they say and take them very seriously and are likely predisposed to assume the worst of the intentions of those who disagree with them politically.

The idea that a nonracist should have nothing to fear from being slandered in a wildly influential media outlet as a racist is absolute and utter nonsense.

If someone knows he is not racist, then he also knows there is no evidence of his non-existent racism. As such, he does not feel the need to prove he is not racist, because he knows that all claims to the contrary are baseless. He trusts that the truth is evident, and that falsehoods will not withstand scrutiny.

The expression, "The guilty dog barks first," exists because those with guilty consciences cannot resist the compulsion to unburden themselves. They feel guilt by accusation, because they are not certain of their innocence, and feel the need to prove their innocence to themselves by proving it to others.

If someone is not racist, then calling him racist is no different than calling him an astronaut: he is not worried that people will believe it, because he has given them no cause to believe it.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I’ve never argued anything about the Russians as far as I can remember. I’ve consistently said I’ll wait for the investigation to conclude.

Eh, you've referred to the Trump-Russia thing as "bullshit" before and you've cosigned people (eg Surt) remarks dismissing it and/or attacking people thinking it could be true. Though that was likely in 2017, can't recall you doing much of it this year.

Man. The Loony Left will just NOT let go of that Nothingburger.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
This is one of the most retarded things I've ever heard.

"Are you a racist?"
"No"
"That's just what a racist would say!"
"When did I say anything racist?!"
"You criticized Islam!"
"Islam isn't a race!"
"It's made up of mostly brown people so clearly only that can be your motivation!"
"You're pulling that out of your ass you don't know my reasons for criticizing Islam, I don't think it promotes good values it has nothing to do with something as shallow as skin color"
"Oh yeah, um well, um, you don't like illegal immigration!"
"Yes I don't want people illegally crossing the border regardless of their color, that's why we have borders and laws and citizenship."
"RACIST!"
"How is that racist?"
"Because mexicans are brown!"
"That's not my reasoning!"
"I CAN READ YOUR MIND AND YOU'RE A RACIST"
"Stop reading motivations into me that you can't actually prove!"
"Oh you protest too much, therefore you must be a racist!"

Originally posted by Emperordmb
You know why statements like this are absolutely retarded?

Because they either imply that there aren't consequences to how other people think about you, or imply that other people can't possibly believe something that isn't true.

Both of these assertions would be absolute and utter nonsense. The way the public perceives you has serious consequences, and it's entirely possible for people to be mislead into believing something that isn't true, otherwise propaganda would've never been a thing because people have this piercing vision that allows them to never view people or events incorrectly.

I mean shit you're a gay guy right? I imagine it wasn't that long ago that gay people might've been sputtering to defend themselves as not mentally ill. Or sputtering to defend themselves as not pedophiles. Right? People who would know that they aren't mentally ill and who know that they don't want to **** children, but who are terrified of people with a lot of influence convincing the public that they do want to **** kids or that they are mentally ill because that shit could absolutely destroy someone's life.

Also why don't you tell that shit to a woman in the Salem Witch trials.

WhY ArE yOU spUtTErInG tO DeFEnD yOuRSeLf If YoU AreNt a WiTCh!!!
Maybe its because some people are stupid and gullible enough to believe she is a witch and will ****ing execute her if they think she's a witch you ****ing moron.

And clearly you never read To Kill a Mocking Bird. "WHY WOULD THE BLACK GUY SPUTTER TO DEFEND HIMSELF IF HE KNOWS HE DIDN'T RAPE THE WHITE GIRL?!"
Oh jeez, maybe because people aren't these omniscient unbiased people who can just intuit that he didn't rape her and will instead assume he did to gratify their own biases?

So it's no ****ing wonder that someone would get seriously defensive about their own character when a ****ing TV anchor accuses them of being racist in front of millions of viewers who trust what they say and take them very seriously and are likely predisposed to assume the worst of the intentions of those who disagree with them politically.

The idea that a nonracist should have nothing to fear from being slandered in a wildly influential media outlet as a racist is absolute and utter nonsense.

DMB, you know I love you, right?

So don't get offended at these next words:

U mad, bro. So mad.

Don't let people get you so worked up.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yeah Adam knows it's people he disagrees with politically that'll always be on the receiving end of accusations of racism from progressives.

He's pretty f*cking stupid, yeah. His arguments sound good as long as you don't spend more than 5 seconds thinking about them.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Tell me more about how Russian interference did not influence the 2016 election.

I did a pretty good job of that, already. 🙂

You're more than welcome to go through each of the individual ads. Download the zips, start keeping tally marks. It's a lot of tedious work.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I did a pretty good job of that, already. 🙂

You're more than welcome to go through each of the individual ads. Download the zips, start keeping tally marks. It's a lot of tedious work.

Russians spending: hundreds of thousands

Hillary's spending: over a billion

Lol@ any dipshit saying Russians won him the election.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
You know why statements like this are absolutely retarded?

Because they either imply that there aren't consequences to how other people think about you, or imply that other people can't possibly believe something that isn't true.

Both of these assertions would be absolute and utter nonsense. The way the public perceives you has serious consequences, and it's entirely possible for people to be mislead into believing something that isn't true, otherwise propaganda would've never been a thing because people have this piercing vision that allows them to never view people or events incorrectly.

I mean shit you're a gay guy right? I imagine it wasn't that long ago that gay people might've been sputtering to defend themselves as not mentally ill. Or sputtering to defend themselves as not pedophiles. Right? People who would know that they aren't mentally ill and who know that they don't want to **** children, but who are terrified of people with a lot of influence convincing the public that they do want to **** kids or that they are mentally ill because that shit could absolutely destroy someone's life.

Also why don't you tell that shit to a woman in the Salem Witch trials.

WhY ArE yOU spUtTErInG tO DeFEnD yOuRSeLf If YoU AreNt a WiTCh!!!
Maybe its because some people are stupid and gullible enough to believe she is a witch and will ****ing execute her if they think she's a witch you ****ing moron.

And clearly you never read To Kill a Mocking Bird. "WHY WOULD THE BLACK GUY SPUTTER TO DEFEND HIMSELF IF HE KNOWS HE DIDN'T RAPE THE WHITE GIRL?!"
Oh jeez, maybe because people aren't these omniscient unbiased people who can just intuit that he didn't rape her and will instead assume he did to gratify their own biases?

So it's no ****ing wonder that someone would get seriously defensive about their own character when a ****ing TV anchor accuses them of being racist in front of millions of viewers who trust what they say and take them very seriously and are likely predisposed to assume the worst of the intentions of those who disagree with them politically.

The idea that a nonracist should have nothing to fear from being slandered in a wildly influential media outlet as a racist is absolute and utter nonsense.

Sounds like the kinda thing a racist would say.