CIA MK Ulta Doc Drop

In this program along with drugging and mind control and vast many other things, they were experimenting with humans and fish that emit electricity to get humans to do the same. That isn't right and morally it's rather disgusting. This guy has filed thousands of FOIA requests and got very little.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
So we should just have all those secrets made public so that the public can decide what should be secret?

Just to review: I'm arguing against a call OP made for transparency. What imaginary argument were you winning?

He called for transparency in crimes against our own you dipshit, he didn't say reveal all intelligence secrets. Do better.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
My point is we shouldn't have these secrets, we cant treat people like this.

^ "These secrets" is, I'm pretty sure, referring to shit like "we drugged our own citizens against their will". Not literally any secret our government has.

You only demand transparency of unprosecuted crimes? K good luck with that squirt, since that apparently makes sense to you 🤪

What I don’t like is for years anyone who said this program exists is a kook. Now when it’s revealed it existed now your accused of subverting democracy and helping Putin.

Instead of trying to get justice and answers on why this exists, the same people who ridicule and insulted the people who said it exists are now trying to silence the people asking for justice.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
You only demand transparency of unprosecuted crimes? K good luck with that squirt, since that apparently makes sense to you 🤪

I'm simply noting nobody was calling for complete and total transparency in all things. It would mean people want the names of any spies we have publicly released.

More news to come out of this.

CIA developed mind control dogs with this same program.

Newsweek is the first major publication to pick this up. Are people going to start calling them agents of Putin and subverting democracy now?

https://www.newsweek.com/cia-mkultra-documents-files-remote-control-dogs-1250519

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
So we should just have all those secrets made public so that the public can decide what should be secret?

Just to review: I'm arguing against a call OP made for transparency. What imaginary argument were you winning?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
How did I miss this thread. Wow the Bash of old in annihilation mode👆

Hey b*tch t*ts how is Bash lying and trying to imply the OP wanted 100% transparency in everything...him being in annihilation mode?

I know I know, you won't have any actual valid argument to present, just trolling, but I figured I'd give you a shot to put forth something of actual substance instead of cucking for Bash.

Originally posted by Surtur
Hey b*tch t*ts how is Bash lying and trying to imply the OP wanted 100% transparency in everything...him being in annihilation mode?

I know I know, you won't have any actual valid argument to present, just trolling, but I figured I'd give you a shot to put forth something of actual substance instead of cucking for Bash.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
haha Reek, get a job. Get something. You so triggered gimp.

^I figured you had nothing of substance to offer b*tch t*ts, thanks for proving it. Moving on 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
^I figured you had nothing of substance to offer b*tch t*ts, thanks for proving it. Moving on 🙂

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Haha reek, do some back exercises. 😆 loser.

Do...any kind of exercise, anything to get rid of those titties you're rocking.

So then maybe like 70-80% transparency of unprosecuted crimes? You really are a stupid pos.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
So then maybe like 70-80% transparency of unprosecuted crimes? You really are a stupid pos.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
So then maybe like 70-80% transparency of unprosecuted crimes? You really are a stupid pos.

You're not very bright. He's talking about transparency for crimes we committed against our own citizens. That is it.

WHY can't you admit you incorrectly described his argument? I don't get it, the topic is 2 pages long, we can ALL see it. He did not argue for what you're claiming he did, period.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're not very bright. He's talking about transparency for crimes we committed against our own citizens. That is it.

WHY can't you admit you incorrectly described his argument?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Finish high school, get a degree loser.

Lose the b*tch t*ts coward, quit cucking for grown ass men. Let him answer why he can't acknowledge he's full of shit.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lose the b*tch t*ts coward, quit cucking for grown ass men. Let him answer why he can't acknowledge he's full of shit.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Get a job loser, get some qualifications, get a gf, choose life. You little gimp.

It's quite clear you know the arguments your bf presented are faulty.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's quite clear you know the arguments your bf presented are faulty.