Originally posted by snowdragonSo you concede it did have an impact which is my point.
Oh don't get so emotional, concession accepted. I never said it didn't have an impact, I said disinformation to the left would have a greater impact then on the right.For the first time in the Center’s surveys, more than half (55%) of Americans ages 50 or older report getting news on social media sites. That is 10 percentage points higher than the 45% who said so in [B]2016.
Those under 50, meanwhile, remain more likely than their elders to get news from these sites (78% do, unchanged from 2016).Just point out on the doll where mother russia touched you inappropriately. [/B]
Russia did not influence me you dummy I did not vote for the retard. Only influenced the idiots and easily led like Surtur and fly. Possibly you too.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you concede it did have an impact which is my point.Russia did not influence me you dummy I did not vote for the retard. Only influenced the idiots and easily led like Surtur and fly. Possibly you too.
Feel free to point out in ANY of my posts in this thread where I said it wouldn't have an impact. My position was that if russia used social media their best bet is to use information that would rile up the left using social media.
So much fail.
Originally posted by snowdragonSo you tried to misrepresent what I said in order to attack a false position. Do you think Russia wanted Hillary to win?
Feel free to point out in ANY of my posts in this thread where I said it wouldn't have an impact. My position was that if russia used social media their best bet is to use information that would rile up the left using social media.So much fail.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you tried to misrepresent what I said in order to attack a false position. Do you think Russia wanted Hillary to win?
Russia using social media to feed trump knuckleheads has a minimal impact. Their voting demographics just don't use enough social media, fact.Now disinformation to feed young liberal voters would have a significantly larger impact, fact.
We need more echo chambers complaining about mother russia!
This is my position, not about Trump or Hillary just that a more effective campaign on social media would leverage information to young democrats.
A special kind of fun information is that when you read a certain level of ad spend FB will assign you an account manager that will actually create additional campaigns for you and help create ads.
I never misrepresented your position which was an attack on what I said, I just showed that you were wrong in your assessment of facts.
Originally posted by snowdragon
This is my position, not about Trump or Hillary just that a more effective campaign on social media would leverage information to young democrats.A special kind of fun information is that when you read a certain level of ad spend FB will assign you an account manager that will actually create additional campaigns for you and help create ads.
I never misrepresented your position which was an attack on what I said, I just showed that you were wrong in your assessment of facts.
What is clear is that all of the messaging clearly sought to benefit the Republican Party — and specifically Donald Trump,” the report says. “Trump is mentioned most in campaigns targeting conservatives and right-wing voters, where the messaging encouraged these groups to support his campaign. The main groups that could challenge Trump were then provided messaging that sought to confuse, distract and ultimately discourage members from voting.
The Russians aimed particular energy at activating conservatives on issues such as gun rights and immigration, while sapping the political clout of left-leaning African American voters by undermining their faith in elections and spreading misleading information about how to vote.
Go sit in the corner where you belong.
😂 😂
Originally posted by RobtardIt is so painfully obvious but these morons keep trying to shift the goalposts to the point we are not even on a field anymore.
@quanThe narrative used to be “Russia didn’t meddle!”, then it changed to “Russian meddling had no impact!” whenthey couldn’t deny it any longer; now it seems to be “Russian meddling only affected the Leftist”.
The natural stages of coping from these people.
Originally posted by Robtard
@quanThe narrative used to be “Russia didn’t meddle!”, then it changed to “Russian meddling had no impact!” whenthey couldn’t deny it any longer; now it seems to be “Russian meddling only affected the Leftist”.
The natural stages of coping from these people.
he case has never been "Russia didn't try to meddle".
And your comment about it only impacting the left seems to be twisting snowdragons words. From what I gathered he was essentially saying that social media would have been a better tool for trying to manipulate leftists as opposed to using it to manipulate those on the right.
Originally posted by Surtur
The case has never been "Russia didn't try to meddle".And your comment about it only impacting the left seems to be twisting his words. From what I gathered he was essentially saying that social media would have been better used trying to manipulate leftists as opposed to using it to manipulate those on the right.
Originally posted by quanchi112Read it, reek.
[B]
What is clear is that all of the messaging clearly sought to benefit the Republican Party — and specifically Donald Trump,” the report says. “Trump is mentioned most in campaigns targeting conservatives and right-wing voters, where the messaging encouraged these groups to support his campaign. The main groups that could challenge Trump were then provided messaging that sought to confuse, distract and ultimately discourage members from voting.The Russians aimed particular energy at activating conservatives on issues such as gun rights and immigration, while sapping the political clout of left-leaning African American voters by undermining their faith in elections and spreading misleading information about how to vote.
Go sit in the corner where you belong.
😂 😂 [/B]
Originally posted by Robtard
@quanThe narrative used to be “Russia didn’t meddle!”, then it changed to “Russian meddling had no impact!” whenthey couldn’t deny it any longer; now it seems to be “Russian meddling only affected the Leftist”.
The natural stages of coping from these people.
Would the Russian dossier be considered election meddling?
Originally posted by snowdragonI backed my assessment with a source while you pretend it was not effective. Quit with your goal post moving. It mattered and it was to benefit trump. Just leave if you cannot be objective.
It's like your punching yourself in the face telling me how much it hurts me. I spoke to how they campaigned, not that it had zero effect. I criticized their effectiveness, not the results.And that is called internet winning from the mother russia whiners.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is so painfully obvious but these morons keep trying to shift the goalposts to the point we are not even on a field anymore.
Bingo.
They also ignore that even if we say social media affects 80% or Liberals and only 20% of Conservatives (not true, just numbers), the topic matter still matters. A pro-Trump/anti-Clinton story is still going to target Conservatives.
Originally posted by RobtardI wish the ignorance of stupidity of trumpers was less rampant. They are too dumb sometimes to even reasonably discuss matters with.
Bingo.They also ignore that even if we say social media affects 80% or Liberals and only 20% of Conservatives (not true, just numbers), the topic matter still matters. A pro-Trump/anti-Clinton story is still going to target Conservatives.