Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Started by DarkSaint851,926 pages
Originally posted by sdsfsfsfsfsfsfs
[img]https://i.pinimg.com/originals/08/24/c0/0824c7d48d60d33f8559918f0422ba.jpg

Yes.

Originally posted by Astner
I don't need you defending me.
tbh, you might

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So we all agree that Nostradamus was a charlatan.

And we all agree that Astner is indeed, a veritable Nostradamus.

Thanks all.


You continuing to push this equivocation fallacy after it's been pointed out to you doesn't earn you any points.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
😂

My arguments are sound, so I don't need anyone to reaffirm my position.

The fact that you and Smurph are circle-jerking each other (while being wrong) makes both of you look even worse.

Originally posted by Smurph
tbh, you might

The debate is over. Both you and Darksaint have been thoroughly debunked. I won, and it will be obvious to anyone who decides to follow our exchange in this thread.

Would you describe your current episode as a rant, or more of a tirade?

Definitely a meltdown.

Originally posted by Smurph
Would you describe your current episode as a rant, or more of a tirade?

Neither, I'd describe as a taunt.

Originally posted by Smurph
Definitely a meltdown.

If I had a meltdown then I'd be responding to you from home. The fact that I don't means that I don't really care, and the reason I'm doing this is because I'm having fun provoking you.

We know you're having fun - we all are.

When you stop having fun, you disappear under the pretense of 'I don't have time for this, will come back to it later ' - but don't.

That's why it's not worth actually debating you, as you don't actually debate 🙂

But as I said - we all agree that you're a Nostradamus, and we all agree he was a charlatan.

Hey Astner, what's a synonym for charlatan?

Originally posted by Smurph
Hey Astner, what's a synonym for charlatan?

Colloquially, on the forum?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We know you're having fun - we all are.

I've been in enough debates to notice that when people start using laughing or smiling emotes to convey their emotional state they're not having fun.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
When you stop having fun, you disappear under the pretense of 'I don't have time for this, will come back to it later ' - but don't.

I'm at work, and there's a process for our projects. In this case, we've made an analysis, reached a conclusion, and found a way to test whether or not that conclusion is accurate, so now we're waiting for the measurements from the lab. But the moment someone from the lab comes down here for clarification on our report, or if I'm told to join for a preview of some other project, I have to respond.

So when I say "I don't have the time for this," I mean it.

If I'm at home then I have all the time in the world, but I have better things to do at home than making fun of you.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
That's why it's not worth actually debating you, as you don't actually debate 🙂

And there's the emote.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But as I said - we all agree that you're a Nostradamus, and we all agree he was a charlatan.

Keep pushing that equivocation fallacy, maybe if you post it enough times you'll manage to gaslight yourself into thinking that you're right, and you won't feel as bad.

But it would probably be better if you just followed your doctor's advice and take whatever medication he prescribed you.

Originally posted by Astner
I've been in enough debates to notice that when people start using laughing or smiling emotes to convey their emotional state they're not having fun.

I'm at work, and there's a process for our projects. In this case, we've made an analysis, reached a conclusion, and found a way to test whether or not that conclusion is accurate, so now we're waiting for the measurements from the lab. But the moment someone from the lab comes down here for clarification on our report, or if I'm told to join for a preview of some other project, I have to respond.

So when I say "I don't have the time for this," I mean it.

If I'm at home then I have all the time in the world, but I have better things to do at home than making fun of you.

And there's the emote.

Keep pushing that equivocation fallacy, maybe if you post it enough times you'll manage to gaslight yourself into thinking that you're right, and you won't feel as bad.

But it would probably be better if you just followed your doctor's advice and take whatever medication he prescribed you.

Well we've already agreed I'm correct, and we've already agreed that Nostradamus is a charlatan who misrepresents things and misinterprets things.

And we agree you're a Nostradamus.

So we are all in agreement 🙂

Originally posted by Astner
I've been in enough debates to notice that when people start using laughing or smiling emotes to convey their emotional state they're not having fun.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So we are all in agreement 🙂

Like clockwork.

We are, as always, in agreement 🙂

You must mistake me for someone else - I've seen how you 'debate', and it's not worth even engaging in anything meaningful because you'll just run off again.

Originally posted by Astner
I've been in enough debates to notice that when people start using laughing or smiling emotes to convey their emotional state they're not having fun.

I'm at work, and there's a process for our projects. In this case, we've made an analysis, reached a conclusion, and found a way to test whether or not that conclusion is accurate, so now we're waiting for the measurements from the lab. But the moment someone from the lab comes down here for clarification on our report, or if I'm told to join for a preview of some other project, I have to respond.

So when I say "I don't have the time for this," I mean it.

If I'm at home then I have all the time in the world, but I have better things to do at home than making fun of you.

And there's the emote.

Keep pushing that equivocation fallacy, maybe if you post it enough times you'll manage to gaslight yourself into thinking that you're right, and you won't feel as bad.

But it would probably be better if you just followed your doctor's advice and take whatever medication he prescribed you.

Your long walls of text however are quite annoying.

Originally posted by Astner

But if you compare Superman to the Silver Surfer, then the tables turn, because Superman's arsenal of powers only make up a small fraction of the Silver Surfer's powers. Not to mention that there are weaknesses (pertaining to red- and yellow sunlight, and arguably Kryptonite) that the Silver Surfer would notice (due to his cosmic awareness), could easily exploit, and that has a consistent record of working against Superman.

- Justice League of America (2006) #23

Surfer saying something isn't a feat anymore than Superman saying he could destroy the entire phantom zone and thus making him universal level power.

You were utterly trounced in the actual Superman/Silver Surfer thread, don't start again.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Your long walls of text however are quite annoying.

Yeah, I figured that one would be a bit too much for your attention span, and knew you'd continue to post emotes as long as you didn't notice it. Well, at least now you know better.

I'm going to clock-out earlier today, and I'm off during twixmas, so I'll let you off the hook.

Boo 🙁

But I stopped your post vomit so....win for me?

As I predicted.....like Nostradamus.

Originally posted by Astner
I don't need you defending me.

Dounting Norrin's words here is like saying Mr. Fantastic is lying every time he reads an instrument. The fact is Gladiator has a radiation weakness, and Norrin's power set lets him replicate it, as it has other forms of energy including the Odinforce itself.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
😂

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

😆