Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Complex characters, shades of grey, real problems, no boring "happy end" to their adventures.
👆
Originally posted by CosmicComet
One has Thor as a founder. The other does not.
😂
Asgard was arguably at its most interesting when it had the x-men/alpha flight angle.
Also, no wonder the guy who wrote some of the best x-men also wrote some of the best Thor (Simonsen).
Characters like Thor and Wonder Woman should technically be the best written characters around, since the writers already have established real world stories to draw upon, but some reason they do not.
I mean take Diana for instance, imagine if they dive into the Underworld and use the Gods there. You could have stories for days.
Originally posted by SquallX
Characters like Thor and Wonder Woman should technically be the best written characters around, since the writers already have established real world stories to draw upon, but some reason they do not.I mean take Diana for instance, imagine if they dive into the Underworld and use the Gods there. You could have stories for days.
The kind of people writing Wonder Woman and Thor are not the kind of people that scoured mythology books as kids.
Originally posted by -Pr-
The kind of people writing Wonder Woman and Thor are not the kind of people that scoured mythology books as kids.
That’s pretty sad if you thing about it. Professionals who’s job is to understand such a simple concept failed, while those paying for said content are more educated on it.
Originally posted by SquallX
Characters like Thor and Wonder Woman should technically be the best written characters around, since the writers already have established real world stories to draw upon, but some reason they do not.I mean take Diana for instance, imagine if they dive into the Underworld and use the Gods there. You could have stories for days.
"Yeah, Ragnarok is good and all, but where is Wolverine?"
"Yeah, Diana helping Hercules with his 12 Labours is good and all, but could we have more...Batman in the story?"