Originally posted by carver9
He wasn't weakened there either. No proof of it.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Key has never really shown any type of super strength or durability 🤷🏾‍♂️
So the question is how the hell did he lift the key, which they never bother explaining and since this is a one-off story they probably never willKey been soft as baby shit broski:
He ain't NEVER been no type of physical powerhouse 🤣 so again the question is how the hell did he lift it
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
The only pressure that key would exert is gravitational. Do you see objects being sucked towards it? No? Cuz it's a comic and the dwarf star properties are there simply for weight purposes, not realistic physics reactions. This is why most feats are idiotic. It's a comic. You can't real life physics this shit. Clearly it has no gravity field. So it's not dUrAbiLiTy.
"Feats don't matter because I said so"
Originally posted by abhilegend
"dreams".Anyway Nullifier was always universe threatening
That was Doctor Doom's narration. Doom is one of the greatest genuises in comics. If he thinks the UN can destroy Universes and is tempted by it in his mental state, I take it as a fact.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I thought savage was dead too......
Savage is alive. He's the kid Hulk.
Immortal/Devil Hulk might come back, but it seems Sterns was able to kill the personality inside Banner's head.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
The only pressure that key would exert is gravitational. Do you see objects being sucked towards it? No? Cuz it's a comic and the dwarf star properties are there simply for weight purposes, not realistic physics reactions. This is why most feats are idiotic. It's a comic. You can't real life physics this shit. Clearly it has no gravity field. So it's not dUrAbiLiTy.
Originally posted by Magnon
The F? One meter away from the key, the gravitational acceleration caused by it would be only about 0.003g, where g is the standard gravity on earth. And this would decrease rapidly with increasing distance. That's not nearly enough to "suck objects towards it".
What's the science behind that claim?
Links?
Equations?
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What's the science behind that claim?
Links?
Equations?
g = gravitational acceleration
G = 6.67408×10^(-11) m^3 kg^(-1) s^(-2)
M = 500000000 kg (mass of the key)
r = 1 m (distance from the key, which I used)
Originally posted by Magnon
Basic physics, really.g = gravitational acceleration
G = 6.67408×10^(-11) m^3 kg^(-1) s^(-2)
M = 500000000 kg (mass of the key)
r = 1 m (distance from the key, which I used)
First of all, your equation is irrelevant. For two reasons. One: it's a comic. None of this shit is factored in. Two: Your equation is measuring freefall in a vacuum. They are not in a vacuum.
Only ignorant people post smart looking equations without understanding what the equation is measuring. Gravitational acceleration would not be the issue here.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
First of all, your equation is irrelevant. For two reasons. One: it's a comic. None of this shit is factored in. Two: Your equation is measuring freefall in a vacuum. They are not in a vacuum.
Only ignorant people post smart looking equations without understanding what the equation is measuring. Gravitational acceleration would not be the issue here.
In any case, your silly claim that "objects would be sucked towards it" has been debunked. Only VERY ignorant people claim stuff without having anything to back it up.
😂 So you obviously can't read, I already explained why your equation was irrelevant, GUESS you ignored that huh
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
First of all, your equation is irrelevant. For two reasons. One: it's a comic. None of this shit is factored in. Two: Your equation is measuring freefall in a vacuum. They are not in a vacuum.
Only ignorant people post smart looking equations without understanding what the equation is measuring. Gravitational acceleration would not be the issue here.