Counts for me, in that it helps form my opinion of the fight.
I’m not asking anyone to change their opinion based on it, just explaining my stance, so no need to get all ‘mod police’.
As an aside, an offscreen feat we actually see the results of (the painting in the moon; that wasnt just a news headline)>baseless posts like ‘Hancock would be a statue to Superman’ when both characters have shown great speed feats.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
We dont know the circumstances around it to quantify the feat. I dont think that feat makes him as fast as Superman in combat. We dont even know where he got the paint. Its not quantifiable.
And i consider posts like ‘Hancock would be a statue to Superman’ bullshit, so we’re even.
But i wont go round and round w. you on this as our opinions are set/derail the thread (which might get someone to call the ‘mod police on BOTH of us).
Hancock FTW. Fun thread. Bye now. 😛
y'know i made thread cos carver had implied hancock was a threat to doomsday, didnt really agree. but i was probably a 10/11 year old when i last watched the movie, and so just to see what i missed or cant remember, pit him against supes. But guys are actually giving him a chance....... still dont see how he wins....
Hancock being a threat to Doomsday is hilarious.
Anyways, him being a threat to Superman is kinda funny too considering the speed difference. I am aware of Hancocks flight to the moon. I always found it silly to grant people super speed reflexes based on flight speed. Now that means every single GL is a FTL monster capable of reacting to The Flash.