WHO IS more dangerous - a SJW or Incel?

Started by Putinbot19 pages

WHO IS more dangerous - a SJW or Incel?

Typical left v right thread. Who is more likely to kill someone? An SJW or a member of the Incel community who hates women and posts constantly negatively about them online.

Well, SJW have a damaged view of society, but in the end, they want to provide something they consider good change to the society. They're not nearly close to what a "good change" is, but in their broken views, they believe themselves to be fighting for good, as wrong as they are. As much as the hardcore SJW communities are as wrong about the world as the incel societies, they are far less predestined to try to harm people around in the most brutal ways.

Incel community is just set negatively towards the world and has the school shooter mentality. So while I would say only 0,1% of them may end up going overboard, they are probably more prone to violence because of the sheer negativity they hold towards people.

Obviously though, in case of both groups, they are a very slim margin.

Just weigh the deaths from terrorist attacks by incels vs those by SJWs. You'll no doubt come up with a couple of dozen incel murders vs zero/zilch/none carried out by sjws.

Originally posted by gold slorg
Well, SJW have a damaged view of society, but in the end, they want to provide something they consider good change to the society. They're not nearly close to what a "good change" is, but in their broken views, they believe themselves to be fighting for good, as wrong as they are. As much as the hardcore SJW communities are as wrong about the world as the incel societies, they are far less predestined to try to harm people around in the most brutal ways.

Incel community is just set negatively towards the world and has the school shooter mentality. So while I would say only 0,1% of them may end up going overboard, they are probably more prone to violence because of the sheer negativity they hold towards people.

Obviously though, in case of both groups, they are a very slim margin.

Good post again Bart. How come Ellimist and co are retards and you're not, or are they trolling me/us.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Just weigh the deaths from terrorist attacks by incels vs those by SJWs. You'll no doubt come up with a couple of dozen incel murders vs zero/zilch/none carried out by sjws.
Agreed Incels will use lethal force

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Just weigh the deaths from terrorist attacks by incels vs those by SJWs. You'll no doubt come up with a couple of dozen incel murders vs zero/zilch/none carried out by sjws.

^ Bingo.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Just weigh the deaths from incels vs those by SJWs. You'll no doubt come up with a couple of dozen incel murders vs zero/zilch/none carried out by sjws.

Let's stick to just intentional homicides, though. For example, homicidal feminists are a thing and have been for decades. Black Panthers murdered people, as well. SJWs can be murderers, as well.

But, I would point out that SJW vs. Incel is kind of odd to begin with. It is almost like saying, "Babies throwing tantrums vs. murders: who commits more murders?"

Clearly, it is not that contrasted and I'm being facetious but that's similar to what the OP is asking.

If your definition of dangerous is who has the higher body count, the incels probably are more dangerous.

If you are going by other standards, like lasting impacts on society, it's the SJW's.

Not so much "who has the higher body count", since only one group has a body count to speak of.

Originally posted by Surtur
If your definition of dangerous is who has the higher body count, the incels probably are more dangerous.

If you are going by other standards, like lasting impacts on society, it's the SJW's.

Can you cite specific examples of these "impacts on society" you're referring to?

Originally posted by Surtur
If your definition of dangerous is who has the higher body count, the incels probably are more dangerous.

If you are going by other standards, like lasting impacts on society, it's the SJW's.

Actually, by body count, it is the SJWs by far. The incels don't even come close.

SJWs get this "trophy" due to how man suicides they cause and it's getting worse. Their particular type of poisonous presence is only causing suicide to get worse.

Intentional Homicide probably goes to the incels.

Raw figures, definitely SJWs.

And even suicides from incels, in part, can be attributed to the SJWs.

SJWs also have an indirect life-cost because of the money wasted on SJW causes. Money that would have saved lives.

If people stopped listening to them, so many lives could be saved.

Originally posted by Surtur
If your definition of dangerous is who has the higher body count, the incels probably are more dangerous.

If you are going by other standards, like lasting impacts on society, it's the SJW's.


👆 👆 👆 👆 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
If your definition of dangerous is who has the higher body count, the incels probably are more dangerous.

If you are going by other standards, like lasting impacts on society, it's the SJW's.

Yeah, incels as a movement aren't as attractive to be a part of for the layman so the scale of what they can accomplish is limited.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Actually, by body count, it is the SJWs by far. The incels don't even come close.

SJWs get this "trophy" due to how man suicides they cause and it's getting worse. Their particular type of poisonous presence is only causing suicide to get worse.

Intentional Homicide probably goes to the incels.

Raw figures, definitely SJWs.

And even suicides from incels, in part, can be attributed to the SJWs.

SJWs also have an indirect life-cost because of the money wasted on SJW causes. Money that would have saved lives.

If people stopped listening to them, so many lives could be saved.


Interesting point, SJWs also probably indirectly have a pretty high child rape count in the UK in a similar manner. All those grooming gangs that police were afraid to investigate because they feared being called racists.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Yeah, incels as a movement aren't as attractive to be a part of for the layman so the scale of what they can accomplish is limited.
I think some edgelords aspire to be Incels neme.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Interesting point, SJWs also probably indirectly have a pretty high child rape count in the UK in a similar manner. All those grooming gangs that police were afraid to investigate because they feared being called racists.
DMB, that's politicians faults. The Police in the UK only ever do what they say.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Actually, by body count, it is the SJWs by far. The incels don't even come close.

SJWs get this "trophy" due to how man suicides they cause and it's getting worse. Their particular type of poisonous presence is only causing suicide to get worse.

Intentional Homicide probably goes to the incels.

Raw figures, definitely SJWs.

And even suicides from incels, in part, can be attributed to the SJWs.

SJWs also have an indirect life-cost because of the money wasted on SJW causes. Money that would have saved lives.

If people stopped listening to them, so many lives could be saved.

Where the hell did you get your substantiating statistics?

Originally posted by Jessica Tandy
Where the hell did you get your substantiating statistics?
Good pount Jess.

I thought all SJWs were incels. Is this a trick question? sly

No, we get laid all the time.