Leftist snowflakes don't know why Trump is bad.

Started by Robtard3 pages

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I even think, as I mentioned yesterday, that it wouldn't even matter anymore if Trump did something blatantly unconstitutional and impeachment worthy that his supporters would still support him.
Trumpers are going to support Trump no matter what he does and no matter how damning Mueller's report and/or the other investigations are. If it's collusion, expect "So what if he colluded, it was to make America great again." or similar.

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers are going to support Trump no matter what he does and no matter how damning Mueller's report and/or the other investigations are. If it's collusion, expect "So what if he colluded, it was to make America great again." or similar.

Yup.

I even saw something about Trump now denying that he said Mexico would pay for the wall. I'm sure his supporters will back him up on that, too.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Yup.

I even saw something about Trump now denying that he said Mexico would pay for the wall. I'm sure his supporters will back him up on that, too.

Today he said: "When during the campaign, I would say 'Mexico is going to pay for it,' obviously, I never said this, and I never meant they're gonna write out a check, I said they're going to pay for it. They are."

In 2016: "It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year."

The Trumper bus cheered.

Originally posted by Surtur
You realize the topic is about impeachment...correct? Read the OP, then get back to me 👆

There is another Trump thread suitable for crying about how awful Trump is, this was asking about impeachment.

Here was me thinking it was about reasons why Trump is bad like the title says.

It might help to read the OP instead of just the title.

Originally posted by Robtard
Today he said: "When during the campaign, I would say 'Mexico is going to pay for it,' obviously, I never said this, and I never meant they're gonna write out a check, I said they're going to pay for it. They are."

In 2016: "It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year."

That is so incoherent. He contradicted himself in the same sentence? It literally makes my brain hurt, which I why I don't even try to follow what the man says. 😑

Originally posted by Silent Master
It might help to read the OP instead of just the title.

Doubt it.

Whoever Trump God was. I can't help wondering if he planned this and Surt fell straight in his trap.

Originally posted by Robtard
Today he said: "When during the campaign, I would say 'Mexico is going to pay for it,' obviously, I never said this, and I never meant they're gonna write out a check, I said they're going to pay for it. They are."

In 2016: "It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year."

The Trumper bus cheered.

Oh, it's this? Yeah, Trump is right, then. He never said "Mexico is going to pay for it" if that's the closest quote to the statement. Do you have something far far better than that?

Seriously, if that's what people have on Trump, for this long, accusing Trump of lying about saying Mexico would pay for the wall...there's nothing there.

I honestly thought Trump said Mexico would pay for the wall until now.

Um, Trump explicitly said he would compel Mexico to "make a one-time payment of $5–10 billion" for the wall.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, it's this? Yeah, Trump is right, then. He never said "Mexico is going to pay for it" if that's the closest quote to the statement. Do you have something far far better than that?

Seriously, if that's what people have on Trump, for this long, accusing Trump of lying about saying Mexico would pay for the wall...there's nothing there.

I honestly thought Trump said Mexico would pay for the wall until now.

Stop trolling

Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, it's this? Yeah, Trump is right, then. He never said "Mexico is going to pay for it" if that's the closest quote to the statement. Do you have something far far better than that?

Seriously, if that's what people have on Trump, for this long, accusing Trump of lying about saying Mexico would pay for the wall...there's nothing there.

I honestly thought Trump said Mexico would pay for the wall until now.

Me saying "I'm going out for a $100 lunch and DDM is going to pay for it" isn't really the same as "I'm going out for a $100 lunch and I'm going to pay for it but get the money back from DDM by charging him an extra buck for the next 100 crusty old porno mags he's buying from me"

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
That is so incoherent. He contradicted himself in the same sentence? It literally makes my brain hurt, which I why I don't even try to follow what the man says. 😑

Yeah, he seemingly did contradict what he just said and even if we excuse that as just more Trump-speak, where he says something and then takes it back in the same or following breath, he's flat-out lying about never saying there would be a one-time payment from Mexico.

Trumpers support this.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Um, Trump explicitly said he would compel Mexico to "make a one-time payment of $5–10 billion" for the wall.

And no where in there does Trump say, "Mexico will pay for the wall."

Language is important. Not your twisted interpretations.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop trolling

I apologize that you don't like it that I am not falling for the bullshit lie that Trump said, "Mexico will pay for the wall." He clearly did not say that. Indirectly, yup, he has a plan to get Mexico to pay for it. But he didn't say that, did he? No, he did not. And making the suggestion that Mexico can pay for it is not the same thing, either. This is not splitting hairs. This is people like you trying your hardest to have another Trump gotcha.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Me saying "I'm going out for a $100 lunch and DDM is going to pay for it" isn't really the same as "I'm going out for a $100 lunch and I'm going to pay for it but get the money back from DDM by charging him an extra buck for the next 100 crusty old porno mags he's buying from me"

A better comparison would be a free-loader room mate that eats your food, doesn't pay rent, and doesn't pay bills. So you say you are shutting off the electricity to their bedroom and if they want electricity, they can make a payment for all of it 2 years in advance for 1/100th the cost of the electricity in that bedroom.

Originally posted by dadudemon

A better comparison would be a free-loader room mate that eats your food, doesn't pay rent, and doesn't pay bills. So you say you are shutting off the electricity to their bedroom and if they want electricity, they can make a payment for all of it 2 years in advance for 1/100th the cost of the electricity in that bedroom.

No. That's a terrible analogy. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
No. That's a terrible analogy. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I am very much ashamed of yourself. He's such a shameful person.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Lol, obstruction of justice, conflict of interest...

General stubborn insanity, lying, normalizing a new level of incompetence and willful ignorance in politics, etc...

But man, he sure is good at standing up to political correctness... and that's all that matters! 👆


Originally posted by Surtur
Obstruction hasn't been proven. Conflicts of interest aren't really impeachment worthy. And nope not even lying or incompetence is grounds for an impeachment actually...

Anyone else find it odd that Trump supporters (at least this one in particular) doesn't actually deny all of what I said, just sort of gloats that it's not actually grounds for impeachment? It's odd to me that there is such pride that our Constitution is lacking in weeding out such a dangerous imbecile for a president. Obviously there is a bug in our system.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Anyone else find it odd that Trump supporters (at least this one in particular) doesn't actually deny all of what I said, just sort of gloats that it's not actually grounds for impeachment? It's odd to me that there is such pride that our Constitution is lacking in weeding out such a dangerous imbecile for a president. Obviously there is a bug in our system.

I don't find it odd as they don't see him as the dangerous imbecile he is, they see him as the orange billionaire (white and ill educated people) peoples champion.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I don't find it odd as they don't see him as the dangerous imbecile he is, they see him as the orange billionaire (white and ill educated people) peoples champion.

Right the totally competent savior who has indefinitely shut down the government.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Right the totally competent savior who has indefinitely shut down the government.

If only the democrats gave him what he wanted.

What position is more reasonable? Just do what I say, and I won't scorch the earth.