Originally posted by abhilegend
Zaar beats the shit out of Thor
Thor is one of my favorites but you're right. Zaar appears to be a high trans tiered character if not higher. He's too durable for Thor, not to mention his displays of outright super speed, as he contended evenly with Superman in combat.
Originally posted by panthergod
Zaar is easily Skyfather level at minimum.
Not really. He has to prove it. Sky Fathers tend to be a large step above what he has displayed so far. For instance, a Sky Father may be able to exit the Phantom Zone by using trans dimensional portals.The key words here are "may be able". Aside from that he has yet to display the exotic abilities of a Sky Father level being. I feel as if I may be guilty of giving him the high trans level or above rating. Too soon imo.
Originally posted by Stoic
Not really. He has to prove it. Sky Fathers tend to be a large step above what he has displayed so far. For instance, a Sky Father may be able to exit the Phantom Zone by using trans dimensional portals.The key words here are "may be able". Aside from that he has yet to display the exotic abilities of a Sky Father level being. I feel as if I may be guilty of giving him the high trans level or above rating. Too soon imo.
That would be Superboy Prime level....
Any of the 3 Thors get turned into Asgardian Pâté.
Originally posted by XLR87T3
His only durability feat is either a hyperbole (most likely), or a WTF tier universal level durability?
Not meaning this to be rude but I never get this style of debating, a character who has relatively few appearances so pick on an aspect and act as if this makes the deciding point in the debate. Let's presume for a minute that Rogol has absolutely no durability feats. Does that mean a 90 year old man could one inch punch Rogol in the heart and kill him?
2 things initially come to mind for me here. First thing is to go on reasonable assumption. Comics are not made for battleboards and never will be. We know what Rogol has done in comics and scans show what he is capable of resisting.
Here it seems like you're trying to pick a hole in one part ignoring the other 90% that actually matters. It's not gonna make the argument any more convincing given that Rogol is immensely fast and strong even if you were to "expose" him having no durability.
Originally posted by One_Angry_ScotA 90 year old woman obviously can't defeat a 7 feet tall buff guy, but let's not act like he's the Living Tribunal here. He has no durability feats that suggests he can tank a planet busting attack, unless we take hyperbole literally. Call that reasonable assumption. He matched strength with Rebirth Superman, who's only large island to small country level in strength (from the supermobile feat, assuming it weighs about 50 tons)
Any of the 3 Thors get turned into Asgardian Pâté.Not meaning this to be rude but I never get this style of debating, a character who has relatively few appearances so pick on an aspect and act as if this makes the deciding point in the debate. Let's presume for a minute that Rogol has absolutely no durability feats. Does that mean a 90 year old man could one inch punch Rogol in the heart and kill him?
2 things initially come to mind for me here. First thing is to go on reasonable assumption. Comics are not made for battleboards and never will be. We know what Rogol has done in comics and scans show what he is capable of resisting.
Here it seems like you're trying to pick a hole in one part ignoring the other 90% that actually matters. It's not gonna make the argument any more convincing given that Rogol is immensely fast and strong even if you were to "expose" him having no durability.