Special Counsel knocks down Buzzfeed as Fake News

Started by Flyattractor5 pages

Sure they did.

no evidence of course.

That never stopped the LLN before.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no they didn't

Really? The FBI used that shit to get FISA warrants.

CNN and MSNBC collectively used the word “impeach” nearly 200 times on Friday before the Special Counsel’s office disputed a bombshell report by BuzzFeed News.

Edit

Edit: (sorry. Having major technical difficulties here.)

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Castro didn’t say a word about buzzfeed. Go read his twitter.

Yes he did.

"If the @BuzzFeed story is true, President Trump must resign or be impeached."

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Here it broken down on how much time the networks spent on it and how many times CNN and MSNBC screamed impeachment.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/buzzfeed-trump-story-was-always-dubious-but-abc-cbs-nbc-still-spent-over-27-minutes-on-it

Also the dossier was published by buzzfeed which everyone still thinks is legit😂

And most of them called for impeachment if the allegation is proven true, which is a reasonable stance.

Leave it to FoxNews to act like that doesn't matter in your article though. "Of course, all of them prefaced their denunciation of the president with the nearly meaningless predicate, “If it’s true.”'

It's a not "meaningless predicate." It's literally the difference between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable one.

Foxnews even points out that the networks that ran it highlight the questionable nature of the story. "All three networks pointed to the questionable veracity of the BuzzFeed piece by Anthony Cormier and Jason Leopold to some degree, but each still gave it coverage with two dithering away over 10 minutes each."

But we'll keep pretending like that little tidbit doesn't matter, just to fuel more of this "lolLeftists", "lolRightists" nonsense.

Foxnews thinking they are much better than Buzzfeed is adorable though.

Thanks Bash and Style Time for explaining networks said if true and pointed out it was a dubious story. 👆 TI this thread seems more like the old you than the new you.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Thanks Bash and Style Time for explaining networks said if true and pointed out it was a dubious story. 👆 TI this thread seems more like the old you than the new you.

My bad

Originally posted by StyleTime
Yes he did.

"If the @BuzzFeed story is true, President Trump must resign or be impeached."

And most of them called for impeachment if the allegation is proven true, which is a reasonable stance.

Leave it to FoxNews to act like that doesn't matter in your article though. "Of course, all of them prefaced their denunciation of the president with the nearly meaningless predicate, “If it’s true.”'

It's a not "meaningless predicate." It's literally the difference between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable one.

Foxnews even points out that the networks that ran it highlight the questionable nature of the story. "All three networks pointed to the questionable veracity of the BuzzFeed piece by Anthony Cormier and Jason Leopold to some degree, but each still gave it coverage with two dithering away over 10 minutes each."

But we'll keep pretending like that little tidbit doesn't matter, just to fuel more of this "lolLeftists", "lolRightists" nonsense.

Foxnews thinking they are much better than Buzzfeed is adorable though.

Its still ridiculous they went hog wild with it, and lets be real, this isnt the first time they did this.

"Breaking News: Michael Flynn to testify that Trump ordered him to collude with Russia."

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
rightist-planted red herring.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
right, but they all remembered to immediately point to "buzzfeed"; most often in the headlines as they would for breitbart or the enquirer.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was stupid and irresponsible for them to run with it anyway. i always thought it was a dumb practice to spend any time with dubious sources. glad it's a suddenly popular opinion 👆
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they never ran it as if it was verified, idiot
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no they didn't
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no evidence of course.

hmm

What's going on, here? Why so active and defensive in this particular thread?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Its still ridiculous they went hog wild with it, and lets be real, this isnt the first time they did this.

"Breaking News: Michael Flynn to testify that Trump ordered him to collude with Russia."

You're right and there's nothing wrong with this thread. Everyone major leftist news organization was shitting themselves over this story and jerking each other off to the potential demise of Trump.

CNN and MSNBC were running this story and things around it nearly non-stop for an entire day. It was on in the morning, on in the afternoon, and on after Mueller made their clarifications. It was quite pathetic.

nobody cares, chimpy

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nobody cares, chimpy

You clearly do, Douchar. Just wondering why this particular situation has you so wound up and acting like a Democratic Party apologist shill.

still mad that you got your friend banned? stupid chimp

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
still mad that you got your friend banned? stupid chimp

Tell me more of your thoughts. Anything else in that mind of yours?

I would bet they didn't. I mean This something Main Stream Media is talking about....cause they already lie all the time.

nobody cares. oh well

So you admit you don't care either, but you keep posting regardless?

do more drugs, retard.