Originally posted by Silent Master
It's not clear, because we don't know what you mean by at their best. your definitions have a tendency to change when it suits you.
Originally posted by The Spectre+
[b]that, SILENT, also APPLIES TO YOU (we can all cite examples of that), and to almost everyone on this forum. we are not robots that must follow a certain patern of order, heed their programing and never deviate from the the way they're meant to act.
so as h1 said let the thread move on [/B]
Give me some examples of my definitions/standards changing.
Originally posted by StealthRanger
"Average" of course being a fancy pseudo-synonym for "ignoring everything you don't like"Anyways this is a pretty random thread
By best, he could mean.
1. Best they're shown to perform
2. Best we can extrapolate from their on-screen feats
3. Best we think the writer intented for them to operate at.
Etc etc etc
He has many different definitions, depending on what he thinks will help whatever side he's currently arguing for. it's why I try and nail down exactly what he means these days.
Best they were shown to perform.
Tbh, I don't really know who wins here. I was watching Star Wars and remembered how formidable Dooku was. So I thought about who would be an interesting match for him. That's why I created the thread.
I guess it's hard to tell who wins here.
Anyway, if someone can think of a better match for Dooku (no clear cut winner and no other force user) then post it here.
I think it is a fairly good match. Dooku is a glass cannon compared to her though. If she gets one hit in, I highly doubt he will survive it. If she had ever been hit with HV we could make an assumption about how a lightsaber would fare against her.
I think WW can edge him out possibly bit I'm definitely open to change my mind on this one.
WW 6/10