Originally posted by Eternal Idol
The argument is that admitting immigrants will save far more lives (immigrant lives), and the risk to American lives is minimal.
Wouldn't Surtur's argument about stricter regulations on abortion result in saving far more lives(babies lives), with the risk to the mother's lives being minimal?
Originally posted by Badabing
Boy, that's very difficult. As an outside observer, I would want the baby to live. But if it's my wife that could die, I would falter. Regardless I would feel damned for thinking one way or another. I 100% believe it's the mother's choice to decide who survives.As for rape and incest, I'm for the mother's decision. I couldn't even begin to understand the agony of having a baby growing inside me that came from violence. But there is still s small part of me who considers the baby innocent and has a right to live. But I would still 100% defer to the mother's decision.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Wouldn't Surtur's argument about stricter regulations on abortion result in saving far more lives(babies lives), with the risk to the mother's lives being minimal?
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Non-sequiturs can be great, but leave them to the professionals.Any other shit unrelated to the thread you'd like to add, before we move on?
It's not a Non-sequitur, we were having a discussion about Surtur's comparison of the two positions. but if you can't answer. I'll drop it. don't want you to get upset.
Originally posted by Eternal IdolIt would be one of the worst situations imaginable. Too bad we couldn't sacrifice Rob or Broly instead...mmm
I've been divorced and single for a couple of years now, but there would be no doubt in my mind that I would rather save the woman in my life than our unborn child.
😛
Originally posted by Silent Master
It's not a Non-sequitur, we were having a discussion about Surtur's comparison of the two positions. but if you can't answer. I'll drop it. don't want you to get upset.
What the **** do gun ownership and restrictions have to do with birth and abortion?
Since you can't seem to remember Surtur's post, even though you just responded to it.
Originally posted by Surtur
Oh and about my gun comment, lunatic leftists have spouted this "if it even saves one life yo!" logic when it comes to gun control(strangely this is never applied to illegal immigrants, weird!). You guys have utterly forfeited this stance. Why is this hard to get?If stricter regulations on abortion safe even one life...amirite? Cuz abortions that are done due to health concerns to the mother are super rare.
Originally posted by Badabing
It would be one of the worst situations imaginable. Too bad we couldn't sacrifice Rob or Broly instead...mmm😛
Rob is an OG poster who still frequently contributes to the discussions here. Let's sacrifice inactive posters instead.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Since you can't seem to remember Surtur's post, even though you just responded to it.
So make a credible argument of your own, and stop cheerleading Surtur.
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
That had **** all to do with abortion, as well. I know where Surtur was going with it, and I've already responded to it.So make a credible argument of your own, and stop cheerleading Surtur.
Originally posted by Surtur
Oh and about my gun comment, lunatic leftists have spouted this "if it even saves one life yo!" logic when it comes to gun control(strangely this is never applied to illegal immigrants, weird!). You guys have utterly forfeited this stance. Why is this hard to get?If stricter regulations on abortion safe even one life...amirite? Cuz abortions that are done due to health concerns to the mother are super rare.
I gotta say about the Virginia Governor...I don't think he should resign. I also realize that the democrats have backed themselves into a corner cuz, per their own rules, he does need to resign lol.
They know it's not right to ask him to resign, but they will sacrifice him anyways for the sake of purity.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Still has **** all to do with abortion. Again, I know where this argument is going, but it's a false equivocation.
Nobody is harmed by simply being denied ownership of guns or certain type of guns. On the other hand, someone's life may be saved by the fact that some impulsive hotheaded dipshit didn't have a gun with him after losing his temper.
Meanwhile, a woman is physically and chemically affected for all nine months of her pregnancy, would experience excruciating pain during childbirth, and still runs the risk of being psychologically traumatized by it (e.g. postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis) or dying from complications during childbirth.
Don't be a ****ing moron.
Originally posted by Surtur
I gotta say about the Virginia Governor...I don't think he should resign. I also realize that the democrats have backed themselves into a corner cuz, per their own rules, he does need to resign lol.They know it's not right to ask him to resign, but they will sacrifice him anyways for the sake of purity.
Figured I'd ask as there seems to be some confusion, Eternal Idol says that your question about abortion wasn't about abortion. is that true?