Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
White man kills black man, shouldn't be spoken in the same sentence as MAGA hats arguing with an upset old man from a culture that was destroyed etc.
you can be upset about both, even upset about one more than the other
but don't distort facts and truncate videos like your media did, did you know that said "old man" not only has assault charges but lied about being a Vietnam vet?
Or women are raped, but some women lie, they shouldn't be believed.
or maybe don't make sweeping statements and say 100% of women should or shouldn't be believed
Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by RobtardAnd this is indeed the problem.with rightist equalization.
Equalization is how you make something on your side (or more associated with) that is shitty, seem less shitty.eg
-White Supremacist march, slinging racial slurs, inciting people to violence and a woman ends up being murdered; with multiple others injured by said like-minded White Supremacist.
Options:
A) Condemn White Supremacy and the murder.
B) Try to make those actions seem less vile via equalization. "What about Antifa!"
Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Valkorionthose would be the rational responses and not post every incident where a guy is being fitted up by a woman and ignore the many more when a guy isn't to push a narrative.
you can be upset about both, even upset about one more than the otherbut don't distort facts and truncate videos like your media did, did you know that said "old man" not only has assault charges but lied about being a Vietnam vet?
or maybe don't make sweeping statements and say 100% of women should or shouldn't be believed
Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
those would be the rational responses and not post every incident where a guy is being fitted up by a woman and ignore the many more when a guy isn't to push a narrative.
yes, this selective reporting is done by both leftist and right wing sources
i've noticed that for ex: dmb is much more willing to admit faults with conservatives than you are with liberals
Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
And this is indeed the problem.with rightist equalization.
Funny/not funny topical point. Somehow the White Supremacist chanting racial remarks and wearing known symbols of hatred and oppression wasn't an incitement to violence back then, but beating a drum close to someone is. Weird, that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Valkorionwell that's the false equalization, it's usually someone on the right who has killed someone or something equally serious, the leftist has usually banged a drum or thrown ice cream.
yes, this selective reporting is done by both leftist and right wing sourcesi've noticed that for ex: dmb is much more willing to admit faults with conservatives than you are with liberals
Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by RobtardYeah, it's ludicrous how they can't see who they are. Throwing a milkshake is equal to running someone over in a car.
Funny/not funny topical point. Somehow the White Supremacist chanting racial remarks and wearing known symbols of hatred and oppression wasn't an incitement to violence back then, but beating a drum close to someone is. Weird, that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, it's ludicrous how they can't see who they are. Throwing a milkshake is equal to running someone over in a car.
Let's be fair, it was chocolate milk being poured on someone and it was tantamount to physical assault, not murder.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Can you link me to Antifa being classified terrorists with homeland please.
Originally posted by dadudemon
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/01/antifa-charlottesville-violence-fbi-242235Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as “antifa” had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as “domestic terrorist violence,” according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they'll never successfully ban anti-fascism, all they can do is ban the organization known as "antifa".
so let them throw in an antifa-ban as a whiney backslide in a federal ban on nazi organizations.notice even in the NJ banning it's never mentioned that anti-fascism=terrorism but rather simply refers to 'antifa' and labels them 'anarchists'
https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/...tremists-antifayet implies that nazis=terrorists like a mother****er.
https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/...premacy-in-2017As you can clearly see, I am right as always 👆
As we can all tell, you were wrong. Once you were proven wrong, you shifted the goalposts to talking about banning Antifa when the original question and topic was about Antifa being classified as a domestic terrorism organization
I'm not sure why anyone would fail to see your dishonest tactics. Seems rather obvious that your a sleazeball.
Did anyone fall for PVS' trick? Did anyone actually believe him when he weirdly shifted the topic to bans?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nnnope 🙂
Yyyyup. They didn't magically get declassified. If so, please post your source. 🙂