The problem with rightist equalization.

Started by ArtificialGlory4 pages

Antifa’s ideological ilk are responsible for the deaths of tens of millions and oppression and the tyrannizing of billions more. They deserve no leniency or excuses made for them, just like certain other groups I could name...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#JustChimpyThings

As you can clearly see, I am right as always 👆

nnnope 🙂

Why do you support Antfi, I really would like to know.

Well no really but crack on with the equalization.

Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
White man kills black man, shouldn't be spoken in the same sentence as MAGA hats arguing with an upset old man from a culture that was destroyed etc.

you can be upset about both, even upset about one more than the other

but don't distort facts and truncate videos like your media did, did you know that said "old man" not only has assault charges but lied about being a Vietnam vet?


Or women are raped, but some women lie, they shouldn't be believed.

or maybe don't make sweeping statements and say 100% of women should or shouldn't be believed

Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Robtard
Equalization is how you make something on your side (or more associated with) that is shitty, seem less shitty.

eg

-White Supremacist march, slinging racial slurs, inciting people to violence and a woman ends up being murdered; with multiple others injured by said like-minded White Supremacist.

Options:

A) Condemn White Supremacy and the murder.
B) Try to make those actions seem less vile via equalization. "What about Antifa!"

And this is indeed the problem.with rightist equalization.

Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Valkorion
you can be upset about both, even upset about one more than the other

but don't distort facts and truncate videos like your media did, did you know that said "old man" not only has assault charges but lied about being a Vietnam vet?

or maybe don't make sweeping statements and say 100% of women should or shouldn't be believed

those would be the rational responses and not post every incident where a guy is being fitted up by a woman and ignore the many more when a guy isn't to push a narrative.

Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
those would be the rational responses and not post every incident where a guy is being fitted up by a woman and ignore the many more when a guy isn't to push a narrative.

yes, this selective reporting is done by both leftist and right wing sources

i've noticed that for ex: dmb is much more willing to admit faults with conservatives than you are with liberals

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why do you support Antfi, I really would like to know.

slander because you can't emotionally cope with seeing your buddybro proven wrong. boohoo spura

Ok so you dont support Antifa? Im trying to get your position. If all you want to do is throw insults, we can just go back to ignoring each other. I dont honestly feel like you want to have an actual conversation or take a solid position.

Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
And this is indeed the problem.with rightist equalization.

Funny/not funny topical point. Somehow the White Supremacist chanting racial remarks and wearing known symbols of hatred and oppression wasn't an incitement to violence back then, but beating a drum close to someone is. Weird, that.

Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Valkorion
yes, this selective reporting is done by both leftist and right wing sources

i've noticed that for ex: dmb is much more willing to admit faults with conservatives than you are with liberals

well that's the false equalization, it's usually someone on the right who has killed someone or something equally serious, the leftist has usually banged a drum or thrown ice cream.

Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Robtard
Funny/not funny topical point. Somehow the White Supremacist chanting racial remarks and wearing known symbols of hatred and oppression wasn't an incitement to violence back then, but beating a drum close to someone is. Weird, that.
Yeah, it's ludicrous how they can't see who they are. Throwing a milkshake is equal to running someone over in a car.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, it's ludicrous how they can't see who they are. Throwing a milkshake is equal to running someone over in a car.

Let's be fair, it was chocolate milk being poured on someone and it was tantamount to physical assault, not murder.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Robtard
Let's be fair, it was chocolate milk being poured on someone and it was tantamount to physical assault, not murder.
true i nearly got charged for throwing a Bacardi in someone's face once.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
banged a drum

more like "tapped", but yeah

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Can you link me to Antifa being classified terrorists with homeland please.

Originally posted by dadudemon
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/01/antifa-charlottesville-violence-fbi-242235

Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as “antifa” had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as “domestic terrorist violence,” according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they'll never successfully ban anti-fascism, all they can do is ban the organization known as "antifa".
so let them throw in an antifa-ban as a whiney backslide in a federal ban on nazi organizations.

notice even in the NJ banning it's never mentioned that anti-fascism=terrorism but rather simply refers to 'antifa' and labels them 'anarchists'
https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/...tremists-antifa

yet implies that nazis=terrorists like a mother****er.
https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/...premacy-in-2017

As you can clearly see, I am right as always 👆

As we can all tell, you were wrong. Once you were proven wrong, you shifted the goalposts to talking about banning Antifa when the original question and topic was about Antifa being classified as a domestic terrorism organization

I'm not sure why anyone would fail to see your dishonest tactics. Seems rather obvious that your a sleazeball.

Did anyone fall for PVS' trick? Did anyone actually believe him when he weirdly shifted the topic to bans?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nnnope 🙂

Yyyyup. They didn't magically get declassified. If so, please post your source. 🙂

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The problem with rightist equalization.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
more like "tapped", but yeah

Pounding a drum like it owed him money and singing loudly in his face, but yeah. 😉

DDM classified documents formalize nothing.

A group that riots and burns down the school is a terrorist group, point blank.

Doesnt matter if they are on paper as being one.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
A group that riots and burns down the school is a terrorist group, point blank.

Doesnt matter if they are on paper as being one.

so, they are not officially a terrorist group, being emotive formalises nothing TI.