2020 Presidential Election Discussion

Started by Surtur523 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
Probably Tulsi if she's available to vote for. If not, none. No candidates best fit my choices. You're supposed to vote for one that fits you over 80%. None of them fit my policies over 80%. Yang came close.

But I've already stated who I would vote for in November several days ago. I didn't make it a secret.

See here:

Tulsi is hot. Yeah. I'd vote for her if she got the nomination.

She won't though, we both know that.

^ Called it.

What did you call? Think carefully, this is a make or break moment for your legendary memory 🙂

Sorry, not going to play your silly games, surt.

So you wisely have remembered I've mentioned more than once in the past I'd vote for Tulsi or Yang, thus avoiding embarrassing yourself by trying to imply I only said I'd support her cuz DDM just mentioned her.

Wise choice 🙂

Both of those people are the two Dems who DDM has been on a kick on since the start, so you're only proving my point. Was that intentional?

Originally posted by Robtard
Both of those people are the two Dems who DDM has been on a kick on since the start, so you're only proving my point. Was that intentional?

Both me and DDM have praised them from the start yeah. But that isn't what you're trying to imply. You tried(and failed) to imply that I had any support for them *because* of him.

Now: are you bright enough to just move on, or dumb enough to keep trying to push this false narrative?

Bernie won in Cali. Good for him.

Originally posted by Surtur
Both me and DDM have praised them from the start yeah. But that isn't what you're trying to imply. You tried(and failed) to imply that I had any support for them *because* of him.

Now: are you bright enough to just move on, or dumb enough to keep trying to push this false narrative?

Just a co-inn-see-dink, or something.

Originally posted by Robtard
Just a co-inn-see-dink, or something.

What does the first reply in this thread say? The very first response, on the very first page.

It's okay, next you'll be telling me you're cool with UBI now...

You've been on here since at least 2am it seems, go take a nap. <--- sincerely

Originally posted by Surtur
What does the first reply in this thread say? The very first response, on the very first page.

Biden and Sanders won't get it because they're white males.

Clairvoyance skills OFF THE CHARTS!

Originally posted by Robtard
You've been here since at least 2am it seems, go take a nap. <--- sincerely

^Nothing sincere about this. Not only is it a lie(I'd recommend you don't double down) but you're seemingly upset because I just proved you wrong.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Biden and Sanders won't get it because they're white males.

Clairvoyance skills OFF THE CHARTS!

That's all it says, right?

Originally posted by Surtur
That's all it says, right?

No. But that bit was the best bit.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
No. But that bit was the best bit.

You're a good e-friend. You recognized the post proves Rob wrong, but valiantly focused on other things and even flat out left out the part that proves him wrong.

Commendable 👆

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Biden and Sanders won't get it because they're white males.

Clairvoyance skills OFF THE CHARTS!

😂

I long ago tuned out of you two and your tiffs.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Biden and Sanders won't get it because they're white males.

Clairvoyance skills OFF THE CHARTS!

I lol'd

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I long ago tuned out of you two and your tiffs.

I'm sure. You just conveniently avoided posting the part proving him wrong, thus giving him an excuse to hone in on that and avoid embarrassment.